Navigation path

Archives for April 2007
E-mail this pageE-mail this pagePrintPrint

European Commission launches biofuels public consultation

30 April 2007 - The European Commission is looking for the views of public authorities, businesses, non-governmental organisations and other interested parties on the issue of biofuels. The Commission's public consultation addresses questions such as how to achieve a 10% biofuel share by 2020 and how to ensure environmental sustainability.

As part of a range of proposals for an Energy Policy for Europe adopted earlier this year, the Commission set out to encourage the production and use of biofuels by proposing a minimum target for biofuels of 10% of vehicle fuel by 2020 and a 20% target for the overall share of renewable energy. The consultation is aimed at helping the Commission to draft proposals on incorporating these targets into legislation.

EU Energy Commissioner Andris Piebalgs said "Biofuels play a key role in improving security of supply and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in transport, while offering new sources of income to people dependent on agriculture, both in the EU and in developing countries. However, these advantages should not be offset by environmental damage through inappropriate land use or outdated production processes. That is why I am glad to announce this consultation exercise, which will help us design a simple and practical sustainability scheme."

The consultation focuses on four questions:

· How should a biofuel sustainability system be designed?

· How should overall effects on land use be monitored?

· How should the use of second-generation biofuels be encouraged?

· What further action is needed to make it possible to achieve a 10% biofuel share?

The most common biofuels today are biodiesel (made from oleaginous plants such as rapeseed and sunflower) and bioethanol (produced from sugar and starch crops such as beet or cereals). These two liquid transport fuels have the potential to replace diesel and petrol on a large scale. They can be used in the engines of modern cars (unmodified for low blends, or with cheap modifications to accept high blends) and distributed via existing infrastructures. Research is under way to develop “second-generation” production techniques that can make biofuels from woody material, grasses and some additional types of waste.

The consultation will remain open until Monday 4 June 2007 and can be accessed at http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/consultation/biofuels_en.htm.

Further information on the European Commission's Energy Policy for Europe can be accessed at http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy_policy/index_en.htm.

Top

Irish Winners announced in Europe-wide Journalist Competition

Martin Territt, David Lynch, Maria Moynihan and Niall Crowley

Martin Territt, David Lynch, Maria Moynihan and Niall Crowley

27 April 2007 - The Irish winners of a Europe-wide Journalism competition have been announced. David Lynch, of Business World has been declared the national winner of the ‘For Diversity. Against Discrimination’ Journalism Award and Maria Moynihan of the Irish Farmers Journal was winner in the Young Journalist Category. The Awards are presented by the European Commission in recognition of journalism which highlights discrimination issues and as part of the Commission’s "For Diversity. Against Discrimination" information campaign which has a particular focus on workplace discrimination.

The Awards are presented by the European Commission in recognition of journalism, which highlights discrimination issues and are part of the Commission’s "For Diversity. Against Discrimination." information campaign which, provides information on European anti-discrimination policies with a particular focus on workplace discrimination. Entries are currently being sought for the Journalist Award 2007 and a special award will be awarded to mark the European Year of Equal Opportunities for All. Entries can qualify for this special award by submitting an article dealing with discrimination on the basis of race or ethnic origin, religion or belief, gender, age, sexual orientation or disability and referring to the European Year of Equal Opportunities for All.

Martin Territt, Director of the European Commission Representation in Ireland said that the Awards recognised the importance of journalism in highlighting issues of discrimination.

“I would like to commend both David and Maria for the quality and perceptiveness of their articles. The articles provide a real insight and understanding of the prejudices faced by sectors of our community. Tolerance and respect are core European values and the European Commission is delighted to support the type of journalism, which gives a real voice to those who are often not heard.

Commenting on the selection of David Lynch’s article, ‘The Persistence of Prejudice’, Niall Crowley, Chief Executive of the Equality Authority and Chairperson of the Irish national jury said that the article was unique in exploring the equality dimension to a news story that enjoyed widespread coverage.

"David Lynch, in this article provided a thoughtful and insightful perspective on the relationship between the Gardaí and the Traveller community and the outcome of the Morris Tribunal. The article demonstrated a keen awareness of equality issues and gave a voice to the Traveller community".

The Irish national jury also rewarded Maria Moynihan of the Irish Farmers Journal the Young Journalist Award.

Commenting on the article ‘Family Ties: No Longer Nuclear’, Niall Crowley said it was a timely and thought provoking exploration of family diversity in Irish society. It is timely given the need for a new policy focus on this theme and it was thought provoking in setting out the extent of diversity of family forms and in affording an opportunity for different families to tell their own stories. This was a worthy winner of the Young Journalist Award.

Accepting the Award, David Lynch said that the article focused on the difficulties posed for the Travelling community in contemporary Ireland and it was the work of other journalists in Ireland and abroad who saw it is as their principal task to write from the perspective of the underdog, which encouraged him to enter journalism.

Accepting the Award in the Young Journalist category, Maria Moynihan said, “that this Award is a great honour for both myself and The Journal. As a young journalist, it’s fantastic to get this level of recognition from the European Commission.”

Top

Special Eurobarometer survey on E-Communications

27 April 2007 - The European Commission has carried out a public opinion survey in order to keep abreast of the consumer side of the rapidly evolving telecommunications markets and, in particular, to assess how consumers benefit from the liberalisation of the market. This survey was carried out between 17 November and 19 December 2006 and covers:

  • general overview of penetration rates
  • fixed and mobile telephony
  • directories and enquiry services
  • computers and internet
  • television
  • bundled offers
  • privacy protection
  • European emergency number

Click here for the executive summary and here for the full report.

Top

Young road deaths in Ireland are highest in EU

Logo of the European Road Safety Day

Logo of the European Road Safety Day

26 April 2007 - New European Commission figures out tomorrow morning (Friday 27 April) show that Ireland has the highest percentage of young people killed in road accidents in the EU. Thirty-eight percent of all people killed in road accidents in Ireland are aged under 25 and thirty percent are in the 18 to 25 age group. The report is published to coincide with the EU’s first European Road Safety Day (Friday 27 April) which has a particular focus on young people. Today’s report also shows that seventy five percent of those who died in the EU in 2005 were males.

In 2002, the European Road Safety Action Programme Commission set a target of halving the number of road deaths in the EU from 50 000 to 25 000 by 2010. The last twelve months have shown an eight percent reduction in road fatalities. In its Action Programme, the European Commission supports Member States in drawing up national road safety plans, getting best practice and good ideas from other countries and adoption of measures on driving time and vehicle safety.

In Ireland, 1997 was the highest year for road fatalities when 473 people died on our roads. Over the last ten years, the number of road deaths has steadily declined with the number for 2006 at around 368. However, this figure is still above the European average.

A second report on road safety published by the European Commission today shows that in Ireland seat belts are worn by eighty-six percent of from seat passengers, compared to ninety-seven percent in France. However, when it comes to the use of seat belts by back seat passengers, Ireland has one of the worst records in Europe with only forty-six percent of back seat passengers using them.

For more information – these links will be updated Friday 27 April 11.00:

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/roadsafety/road_safety_day/index_en.htm

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/roadsafety/road_safety_observatory/profiles_en.htm

Ireland country profile 2005 only

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/roadsafety_library/care/doc/profiles/pdf/countryprofile_ie_en.pdf

Top

Ireland hosts first ever Youth European Council

Students at the Youth European Council

Students at the Youth European Council

26 April 2007 - On Thursday 27th April transition year students from around Ireland debated key political issues in a special "Youth European Council" in the Mansion House in Dublin. Twenty-eight secondary schools, including one from Northern Ireland, took part.

Teams of three students took on the roles of politicians from different European countries to discuss key questions such as climate change, terrorism and immigration. Students got a taste of European political debate at the highest level and produced 'Council conclusions', just like the real European Council.

There was agreement amongst the students that climate change is the most pressing social and financial matter for the world today. The Youth Council pointed out that options such as bio-fuels and renewable sources of energy, as well as the use of nuclear fuel and Helium 3 fuels, should be examined. The students also highlighted the need for education and involvement of individuals in tackling climate change.

On the topic of terrorism the Youth Council concluded that terrorism is a priority matter for the EU and must be tackled on a Europe-wide and indeed world-wide basis. The students stressed that the fight against terrorism cannot be used as an excuse to infringe individual rights and suggested that Turkey’s membership of the EU should be fast-tracked to build a bridge to the Islamic world and show that the EU is not anti-Islam.

Discussing immigration the students concluded that while immigration is essential to maintain the health of the EU economy and to compensate for the falling European birth-rate, action against illegal immigration should be prioritised with severe penalties for people trafficking. They called for increased efforts to integrate immigrants into European societies.

This event, which was the first of its kind to take place in Dublin, is part of the "EU at 50" programme and was chaired by Jillian van Turnhout, head of the Children's Rights Alliance. It heard submissions from representatives of the European Commission and the European Parliament as well as the German Ambassador H.E. Christian Pauls. Members of the diplomatic community also attended.

Background

The European Council is the term used to describe the regular meetings of the Heads of State or Government of the European Union Member States. Its role is to define general political guidelines. Although not an EU institution, it is the highest-level policy-making body in the European Union. It meets at least twice per year and the outcome of European Council deliberations is recorded in the conclusions published at the end of each summit.

Click here for the list of schools that participated.

Top

New atlas shows Ireland among the countries under most pressure from fertilisers

26 April 2007 - The European Commission scientists have produced a new atlas showing the areas of Europe under most pressure from fertilisers and Ireland figures amongst those with the highest levels. Other areas in Europe with high levels are large portions of The Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, France and Italy.

Nutrients are essential for plants and animals, but in excessive amounts they can lead to a significant decrease in soil and water quality. Nutrients can be introduced into the environment through fertilisers or other agrochemicals, and strict regulations have been adopted to limit their use. The new atlas provides for the first time a clear view on the pressure on eco-systems due to nutrients and their source.

The atlas is the product of the FATE initiative (Fate of Pollutants in Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems) at the European Commission's Joint Research Centre, investigating the impact of nutrients such as agrochemicals on the environment. Nutrients get into the environment through agriculture, wastewater treatment plants, industry, and so on. However there has been little research into and no EU wide assessment of the contribution of these sectors to nutrient pollution and the extent of its impact. The FATE initiative was designed to specifically address this gap in environmental research with particular emphasis on agriculture. The results of the project should help better implementation of existing legislation and also provide a scientific basis for any future legislation.

For example, the information used in the atlas shows that the range of surplus nutrients in agro-intensive areas varies widely among European countries, with the Netherlands topping 200 kg/ha and Italy not exceeding 40kg/ha. There is also wide variety of levels within countries: for instance, France has an overall nitrogen excess of 50 kg/ha, whereas Brittany standing alone exhibits levels exceeding 120 kg/ha. The scientists were able to show that excess nutrient loss is often due to practices such as over-fertilisation, making prevention both relatively straightforward and low-cost. Indeed, applications of nitrogen fertilisers were found at times to be twice as high as crop needs. The FATE team was also able to identify a close link between increased nutrient pressures on the environment and high-density livestock production.

The team also evaluated the impact of several climate change scenarios, showing that farmers in already intensive production areas will be forced to increase their use of fertilisers to maintain optimum crop yields, while demand for water resources will also increase, further taxing Europe’s water supply.

For more information: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/

Top

European Commission to recover €285.3 million of CAP expenditure from the Member States

19 April 2007 - A total of €285.3 million of EU farm payments unduly spent by Member States will be claimed back as a result of a decision adopted today by the European Commission.

The money returns to the Community budget because of inadequate control procedures or non-compliance with EU rules on agricultural expenditure. Ireland will be asked for €3.62 million for not respecting payment deadlines, overshooting financial ceilings and insufficient control of the production process for milk powder for casein.

Member States are responsible for paying out and checking expenditure under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), and the Commission is required to ensure that Member States have made correct use of the funds.

Commenting on the decision, Mariann Fischer Boel, Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development, said: “We have been working very hard to ensure the best possible control over farm spending. The clearance procedure is a vital process in ensuring that taxpayers’ money is used properly and that incorrectly spent amounts are recovered. We have made enormous progress over recent years in improving controls and I am determined that these efforts will continue in the future.”

Main financial corrections

Under this latest decision, the 24th since the 1995 reform of the system for recovering unduly spent CAP money, funds will be recovered from Austria, Belgium, Germany, Denmark, Spain, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Finland, Great Britain and Portugal. The most significant individual corrections are:

•         €60.6 million charged to Spain for non-respect of payment deadlines in the nuts payment scheme;

•         €53.7 million charged to  United Kingdom for non-respect of payment deadlines;

•         €48.5 million charged to Italy for non-respect of payment deadlines;

•         €35.8 million charged to Greece because the LPIS (Land parcel identification system) implemented to manage the direct payments schemes was found to be not fully operational to the standard required and on-the-spot checks were still carried out too late to be fully effective;

•         €26.7 million charged to the Netherlands because of  the insufficient number of substitution controls in the export refund scheme;

•         €17 million charged to Spain for non-respect of payment deadlines;

•         €8.7 million charged to France concerning the over thirty months slaughter scheme – technical and accounting controls were found to be deficient;

•         €7.5 million charged to France for weaknesses in the control system for subsidised-interest-loans and in secondary controls concerning  Rural Development Programmes expenditure;

For details on how the clearance of annual accounts system works, see MEMO/06/178

 

 

Annex I

Clearance of accounts of EAGGF – Guarantee section

Decision 24: Corrections by Member state

 

Amount in million EURO

Austria

 

Financial audit: overshooting of financial ceilings

   0.001

 

Belgium

 

Clearance of 2001 and 2003 accounts

   0.09

 

Germany

 

Clearance of 2003, 2004 and 2005 accounts

   4.70

Financial audit: non-respect of payment deadlines

   0.12

Financial audit: overshooting of financial ceilings

   0.13

 

Denmark

 

Export refunds: inadequate implementation of substitution checks

   6.61

Financial audit: overshooting of financial ceilings

   0.07

 

Spain

 

Fruit & Vegetables – Nuts: non-respect of payment deadlines

 60.6

Fruit & Vegetables – Tomato Processing: tomatoes delivered outside the regular day-time working hours of the competent authorities could not be adequately controlled, insufficient reconciliation of records with official bookkeeping

   4.09

Promotional Measures: ineligibility of a programme

   0.09

Promotional Measures: deficiencies in accounting and technical controls

   1.2

Financial audit: non-respect of payment deadlines

 17.0

 

France

 

Over thirty months slaughter (OTMS) scheme: deficient and missing physical control of the operations

   8.69

Fruit & Vegetables – Peaches & Pears Processing: several payments made outside the regulatory deadline

   0.02

Public Storage of Alcohol: non-respect of payment deadlines

   0.02

Rural Development Guarantee new measures: weakness in secondary controls, weakness in the control system for subsidized-interest-loans

   7.49

 

Greece

 

Area Aids: LPIS not fully operational and on-the-spot checks were still carried out too late to be fully effective

 35.8

Fruits & Vegetables – Tomato Processing: data in the records not reconciled with the official accounts of the producer organization; data transmitted by the producer organisation without the information regarding the yield

   0.4

POSEI: insufficient proof that the benefit of the aid passed on to the end user; insufficient controls at arrival; absence of IACS

   1.90

Rural Development Guarantee Accompanying Measures: total of monthly declarations exceeds the amount of the annual declaration

   0.07

 

Ireland

 

Financial audit: non-respect of payment deadlines

   1.0

Financial audit: overshooting of financial ceilings

   0.12

Milk powder for casein: insufficient control of production process

   2.50

 

Italy

 

Financial audit: non-respect of payment deadlines

 48.5

Financial audit: overshooting of financial ceilings

   0.05

Rural Development Guarantee new measures: insufficient controls of the minimum standards, incomplete risk analysis for the selection of beneficiaries to be checked on-the-spot

   0.29

Wine – restructuring: overestimation of wine growing area

   2.4

 

Luxembourg

 

Financial audit: non-respect of payment deadlines

   0.09

Financial audit: overshooting of financial ceilings

   0.15

 

The Netherlands

 

Clearance of 2003 accounts

   0.16

Export refunds: insufficient number of substitution controls

 26.66

 

Finland

 

Financial audit: non-respect of payment deadlines

   0.06

Financial audit: overshooting of financial ceilings

   0.004

 

 United Kingdom

 

Financial audit: non-respect of payment deadlines

 53.7

Financial audit: overshooting of financial ceilings

   0.18

Recoveries: incorrect classification of irregularities

   0.03

 

Portugal

 

Financial audit: non-respect of payment deadlines

   0.4

Financial audit: overshooting of financial ceilings

   0.03

 

TOTAL

285.3

 

Top

European Commission report shows rise in the number of dangerous products being taken off the market

Image of teddy bear

Image of teddy bear

19 April 2007 - Improved cooperation between European Union customs authorities has led to an increase in the number of dangerous consumer products ─ from teddy bears to hairdryers, cleaning sprays, mini-motorbikes, cigarette lighters and ski boot bindings ─ removed from the EU market last year.

The Annual RAPEX Report on dangerous consumer products published today by the European Commission also shows that toys have taken over from electrical appliances as the product category most often removed from the market.

“This Rapid Alert System is a powerful watchdog and an excellent example of European value added," said European Commissioner for Consumer Affairs Meglena Kuneva. “The constant increase in the number of measures notified is a good sign, it shows that vigilance across Europe is getting better and better. Today's annual report shows that the system in 2006 is working better than ever before. My task is to make it grow to its full potential.”

China was indicated as the country of origin in almost half of all cases (440 notifications or 48%). In total, restrictive measures concerning 924 dangerous products were reported through RAPEX last year, compared to 701 in 2005, representing a 32% increase.

The Irish authorities notified RAPEX of 14 dangerous products in 2006, or 2% of the total.

Through RAPEX, the Rapid Alert System for non-food consumer products, national authorities notify the Commission of products presenting a serious risk for the health and safety of consumers, with the exception of food, pharmaceuticals and medical devices. This information is rapidly shared among all other surveillance authorities in 30 European countries, and dangerous products are then banned or their sale is restricted on the market.

The Commission is calling for enhanced participation from all EU Member States, joint efforts with and between national market surveillance and customs authorities, and co-operation with third countries to further increase the effectiveness of the system.

The number of notifications has risen steeply during the last few years. In the second year after the entry into force of revised rules governing non-food consumer product safety in Europe, the number of notifications relating to products presenting a serious risk has more than doubled from 388 in 2004 to 924 in 2006.

In 2006, there was an increase of 32% in relation to 2005 for serious risk notifications. Over 40% of all notifications concern voluntary measures taken by businesses - a considerable year-on-year increase. This is a clear indicator of growing safety awareness on the part of European economic operators.

Five countries accounted for 60% of all notifications:

  • Germany (144 notifications, 16%),
  • Hungary (140 notifications, 15%),
  • Greece (98 notifications, 11%),
  • United Kingdom (92 notifications, 10%),
  • Spain (79 notifications, 9%).

The assessment of the functioning of the system in 2006 indicates that there is still an uneven distribution of notifications and reactions relating to products presenting a serious risk among Member States. Therefore there is a need for some Member States to improve their participation in the RAPEX system.

Toys and electrical appliances top the list

Most frequently notified products included:

  • toys (221 notifications, 24%),
  • electrical appliances (174 notifications, 19%),
  • motor vehicles (126 notifications, 14%),
  • lighting equipment (98 notifications, 11%),
  • cosmetics (48 notifications, 5%).

Toys, electrical appliances and motor vehicles alone accounted for more than half of the notifications in 2006. This is in line with the previous year's results. The main difference is that for the first time, toys took over from electrical appliances as the product category most often notified.

Most frequent risks

The five main risk categories were:

  • injuries (274 notifications, 25%),
  • electric shock (270 notifications, 24%),
  • fire risk/burns (194 notifications, 18%),
  • choking/suffocation (157 notifications, 14%),
  • chemical risk (95 notifications, 9%).

Main country of origin

The People's Republic of China was indicated as the country of origin of the notified product in almost half of all cases (440 notifications, 48%). To address this, the Commission has intensified its cooperation on product safety with China. Given the fact that China has rapidly become one of the biggest exporters of consumer products to Europe, in 2006 the Commission signed a Memorandum of Understanding and a Roadmap for safer toys to improve the safety of incoming products.

Click here for the RAPEX Report 2006 and here for further information about RAPEX.

Top

Motor insurance for all passengers: Irish legislation incompatible with EU law, says ECJ

19 April 2007 - The European Commission Representation in Ireland has welcomed the European Court of Justice’s ruling on a case brought by Elaine Farrell, who was travelling in the load space of an uninsured van when it crashed in 1996. She sought compensation from the Motor Insurers’ Bureau of Ireland, but her request was refused on the basis that the part of the van in which she was travelling was not designed to carry passengers and that Irish legislation excluded persons travelling in this manner from compensation.

The Court has ruled that the Third Motor Insurance Directive requires all passengers to be covered by motor insurance and therefore Irish national legislation, which precludes those not travelling in a part of a vehicle designed to carry passengers, is incompatible with Community law.

Martin Territt, Director of the European Commission Representation, said: “I welcome the clarity this judgment brings to this question and I hope that Irish legislation will now be amended as soon as possible to give all passengers the protection they deserve under European law.”

The Court also noted that the issue of insurance cover is separate from that of the amount of compensation to be paid. In this respect, civil liability and the amount of compensation is a matter for national law, taking into account the need to maintain the effectiveness of Community law. Therefore, in exceptional circumstances, and provided it is not disproportionate, Member States may reduce the amount of compensation to take into account the contribution of the victims to their injuries.

Background

This case arose out of a road traffic accident which occurred in 1996 in Ireland. Elaine Farrell was travelling in the load space of an uninsured van when it crashed into a wall. As the van was uninsured, Ms Farrell sought compensation from the Motor Insurers' Bureau of Ireland ('MIBI'), an organisation whose duty it is to provide compensation for victims of accidents involving uninsured vehicles. Her request was refused on the basis that the part of the van in which she was travelling was not designed to carry passengers and that the Irish legislation excluded persons travelling in this manner from compensation.

Ms Farrell has taken a case against the MIBI, claiming that Irish legislation has failed to implement a number of EC directives on compulsory motor insurance, in particular the Third Motor Insurance Directive which requires that “all passengers” be covered by insurance. A reference was made by the Irish High Court questioning whether Ireland was obliged to provide compulsory cover for people travelling in areas of a motor vehicle not designed and equipped with passenger seating.

Top

European Commission calls for better public access to documents of the EU institutions

18 April 2007 - The European Commission is launching a public consultation on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001). The consultation, based on a Green Paper published today, marks a further step in the drive towards more openness in the EU institutions.

A special website at http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/revision/index.htm has been set up for submissions. The consultation runs until 15 July 2007.

Margot Wallström, Vice-President of the Commission in charge of Institutional Relations and Communication Strategy, said: “We are committed to high standards of transparency of EU decision-making process. Access to documents is an important citizens' right. With this consultation, we start the discussion how it can be best exercised."

In the Green Paper, the Commission takes stock of the current rules on public access to documents and outlines some options for improving the system with a view to granting citizens better and easier access to documents of the three institutions and of the Community Agencies.

Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 has been in operation for just over five years. The three institutions have gathered experience in implementing the Regulation and the European Courts have interpreted it in a series of rulings. Therefore, the time seems right to review the Regulation and the European Parliament has asked the Commission to come forward with proposals for amending it.

However, before proposing any changes to the current rules, the Commission wishes to consult the public at large. It has published this Green Paper and opened a dedicated website, through which members of the public, citizens, civil society organisations, economic operators, public authorities and any organisation with an interest in European affairs may submit comments and suggestions.

The Green Paper contains an analysis of the implementation of the Regulation and a summary of the relevant case law of the European Courts. It also features suggestions from the European Commission for improving the current system. The main issues submitted to the consultation are:

  • Should more emphasis be put on promoting active dissemination of information?
  • The rules on public access to documents could be harmonised with the rules on access to environmental information, to which the institutions are bound by an international Convention (the Convention of Århus on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters).
  • Would a single set of rules for access to documents, including environmental information provide more clarity for citizens?
  • How to ensure the proper balance between transparency and the protection of personal data, of economic and commercial interests and of the principle of good administration.

For each item, a questionnaire invites the public to give its opinion and to submit comments and suggestions.

For more information, see: http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/revision/index.htm.

Top

.eu one year on: over 2.5 million have taken up a European address on the web

11 April 2007 - Europe’s internet domain .eu is celebrating its first year of being open to the public. More than 2.5 million domain names have been registered, with 29,869 registered in Ireland. This makes .eu Europe’s third most popular top level domain (TLD) and seventh most popular worldwide. With a 17% increase of registrations over the past five months, .eu is also one of the fastest growing TLD names on the web.

“After just one year .eu has become a well-established part of Europe’s cyberspace,” said Viviane Reding, EU Commissioner for Information Society and Media. “This is a positive sign of the attractiveness of electronic commerce within the EU. I congratulate EURid as the independent not-for-profit registry responsible for .eu, for successfully managing the extremely high demand from industry and the public and for helping us to deploy Europe’s identity online. I welcome in particular the recent efforts made by EURid to make .eu-registrations swifter, safer and cheaper.”

Citizens and companies from all 27 EU Member States have applied for a .eu domain name during its first year of existence, but the strongest demand for .eu has come from Germany (31%), the UK (17%) and The Netherlands (12%). The great success of .eu has also been accompanied by an increase in demand for national domain names in most Member States. For instance, since October last year the growth in the number of national domain names in Germany and the UK (.de and .uk) has been around 5%. The Netherlands (.nl) experienced the highest growth rate – 10% over the same period.

The popularity of .eu with the public also encouraged France to open its national domain name .fr ─ previously reserved only for professionals, associations or public bodies ─ to the public, using rules and practices similar to .eu’s introduction.

.eu’s introduction was smooth, with the systems coping remarkably well despite the rush for registrations. At its peak, in April 2006, 76 domain names were being successfully registered every second. Taking into account the extremely high number of domain names registered during the first year of operation, the number of litigation cases brought before the Czech Arbitration Court in Prague (an average of 60 cases per month in 2006) underlines the sound procedures being followed by EURid to manage .eu. This compares favourably to the average number of cases brought before the UK TLD dispute resolution system (83 per month) or the World Intellectual Property Organization’s Uniform Dispute Resolution procedure for generic TLDs (183 cases per month).

The actual use of .eu increased tremendously during 2006. At present, almost 80% of all .eu domain names lead to a functioning website or an email server.

.eu labels are increasingly used by well known brands from AirFrance, Versace, Dexia, Illy, and Milka to Greenpeace. Also several non-European companies with a strong business presence in Europe began using .eu domain in their advertising campaigns, including Lexus and Sony.

Background

.eu first opened on 7 December 2005 to business holding prior rights. Since early April 2006, registration has been open to all EU residents and organisations with a legal seat in the EU. Central management of the .eu domain names is entrusted to EURid, an independent not-for-profit organisation.

Since 1 January 2007, residents and companies of the new Member States Romania and Bulgaria can also register a .eu domain name.

More information:

http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/doteu/

http://www.eurid.eu/

For the most recent .eu statistics: http://status.eurid.eu/

Top

Commission gives airlines & Member States six months to make air passenger rights regulation work

4 April 2007 - Airlines should apply air passenger rights rules more consistently and Member States should work harder to enforce them, said the European Commission today. It has just published a report that evaluates the results and application of the air passenger rights Regulation, which was introduced two years ago.

The Regulation introduced new rules on compensation and assistance for air passengers in the event of denied boarding, cancellations, long delays and involuntary downgrading. Depending on the circumstances, the Regulation requires airlines to provide passengers with assistance such as accommodation, refreshments, meals and communication facilities, offer re-routing and refunds, pay compensation, and proactively inform passengers about their rights.

“Although there is no doubt that air passengers enjoy better protection today, we must make sure that airlines and Member States fully comply with their obligations,” said European Commission Vice-President Jacques Barrot, who is in charge of transport. “The Commission will give them six months to make the air passengers regulation work and will provide them with full support in that process.”

Although stranded passengers now have specific rights, they are still in a weaker position compared to airlines. For example, airlines often do not inform passengers about their rights when their flights are disrupted, although the Regulation obliges them to do so, since passengers need this information in order to claim their rights.

The European Commission therefore considers that further work is needed in a number of areas: improving enforcement, clarifying the interpretation of certain aspects of the Regulation, establishing clarity between delays and cancellations as different rights are awarded to the passengers depending on the circumstances, and enhancing the role of the National Enforcement Bodies that oversee the application of the common rules.

During the next six months, the Commission will intensify cooperation with the National Enforcement Bodies and airlines in order to achieve better results. If the final outcome remains unsatisfactory, the Commission will initiate infringement procedures against Member States. Should these contacts and procedures fail to reach satisfactory results, the Commission could consider amending the current Regulation.

The Commission has also prepared updated information material in order to better guide passengers concerning their rights. A new poster will be available at all airports before the summer.

For more information, see: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air_portal/passenger_rights/information_en.htm

Top




Last update: 30/10/2010  |Top