Navigation path

Additional tools

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the objective of the Services Directive?

The Services Directive aims to further the Single Market for services, which is one of the cornerstones of European Integration (Articles 3(1)(a), articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (FEU)). In view of the principles of freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, enshrined respectively in Articles 49 and 56 of the FEU Treaty, the Services Directive intends to help realise the full potential of the services sector, by removing unjustified or disproportionate legal and administrative barriers to the setting-up of a business by a service provider or to its cross-border activities in the EU. It also aims at dismantling barriers affecting service recipients (whether consumers or businesses) wanting to have access to services from other Member States, as well as enhancing recipients' rights and the quality of services.

2. What are the main benefits of the Services Directive?

The Services Directive aims to maximise the advantages of the Single Market for services for the benefit of consumers and businesses. It obliges Member States to cut red-tape, increase transparency for undertakings and service recipients, and eliminate unjustified or disproportionate requirements. This is essential for unleashing the potential of the services sector in the EU.

The Services Directive will bring in particular the following advantages:

  • Improving the functioning of the Single Market for services, which entails:
    • economic growth for undertakings (in particular SMEs),
    • increased competitiveness of EU services and industry,
    • better and broader choice and lower prices for service recipients.
  • Advantages for public administrations: the administrative simplification and modernization will in addition enable public administrations to save money and use their resources more efficiently.
  • More rights for service recipients.
  • Better supervision of service providers.

According to a study by the Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis of November 2007, economic gains from the implementation of the Services Directive range between 60 and 140 billion Euros, representing a growth potential of 0.6-1.5% of GDP.

3. Why was the Services Directive needed?

Because there is a need to unleash the potential of the EU Single Market for services and to develop it further.

Services are of great importance to the EU economy. They account for about 70% of economic activity in the 27 EU Member States. They are the foremost source of foreign direct investment (about 57% in 2008) and, crucially, services are today the source of all net job creation.

However, the European Single Market for services is still not fully developed and integrated. Tellingly, only about 20% of the services provided in the EU have a cross-border dimension. The foreclosure of the EU services market along national lines is accompanied by and linked to a reduced productivity. Whereas the Euro area has achieved productivity levels in the manufacturing sector comparable with those of the US, the productivity gap between the Euro area and the US in the services sector is about 30%.

4. Why are the FEU Treaty provisions about freedom of establishment and free provision of services not enough?

Despite the principles of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services laid down in Articles 49 and 56 of the FEU Treaty, numerous and varied barriers to these principles persist in all Member States. This is the case in spite of the recurrent infringement proceedings brought by the Commission and of national litigation by private parties challenging national barriers. This piecemeal approach based on single infringement proceedings and national cases has indeed proved insufficient to tackle all the persisting barriers. Moreover, it was deemed appropriate to develop the European Single Market for Services beyond what could be achieved by solely applying Articles 49 and 65 of the FEU Treaty, by marking a new and more developed stage of integration in the services sector in the EU. In order to cut red tape and to free the untapped potential of the services sector in the EU, the Services Directive provides the basis for a sweeping and comprehensive reform of national legislation and administrative practice.

5. What is the relationship between the Services Directive and Articles 49 and 56 of the FEU Treaty?

Articles 53(2) and 62 of the TFEU are the legal basis for the Services Directive.  Articles 53(1) and 62 provide that the EC legislator shall issue directives for the coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the taking-up and pursuit of activities as self-employed persons and their free provision of services. The Services Directive constitutes the "translation" into administrative and legislative detail of Articles 49 and 56 FEU Treaty which lay down respectively the principles of freedom of establishment and of freedom to provide services.  The Services Directive sets up a comprehensive system which builds not only upon the existing Treaty fundamental freedoms but also the important body of Internal Market legislation applicable to the services sector. At the same time, in certain regards it further develops the principles set out in Articles 49 and 56 FEU Treaty.

6. What are the novelties introduced by the Services Directive?

The Services Directive does not limit itself to clarifying and systematizing the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union about freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, which as such would already have had added value. It also provides for a sweeping modernization reform of legislation and administration which the Member States are obliged to implement. This reform will in particular facilitate the life of service providers, notably SMEs, who want to set up new or expand existing businesses or provide their services in other Member States on a temporary basis. The most important aspects of this reform are as follows:

  • Administrative and legislative simplification and modernization, including improving transparency and "slimming down" authorization procedures;
  • Set-up one-stop shops for service providers (so called "Points of Single Contact") → possibility to complete formalities and procedures online at a distance;
  • Review and adaptation of the existing legal requirements applicable to services;
  • Elimination of national legal requirements that are discriminatory, unnecessary or disproportionate;
  • Ensuring that undertakings may provide their services cross-border on a temporary basis;
  • Prohibition of total bans on commercial communications by regulated professions;
  • Limits to restrictions to the exercise of multidisciplinary activities.

At the same time, the Services Directive also tackles the problem of "rogue" traders in the Single Market, by setting up:

  • A system of administrative cooperation among national authorities with a view to supervising effectively service providers across borders. 

Finally, the Services Directive improves the rights of service recipients, by providing inter alia for:

  • Non-discrimination against service recipients on the basis of their nationality or place of residence: this obligation of non-discrimination must be complied with by public administrations and by service providers.
  • Comprehensive information rights for service recipients.

7. What is the ambit of application of the Services Directive?

The Services Directive applies to services, defined as self-employed economic activities normally provided for remuneration. Thus, it applies neither to salaried workers, nor to the industrial production of goods, nor to activities which are directly connected with the exercise of official authority as set out in Article 51 FEU Treaty (e.g. police, administration of justice).

The Services Directive applies to all activities and sectors that are not expressly excluded from its scope of application. Relevant examples of activities and sectors covered by the Services Directive include:

  1. RETAIL AND COMMERCE e.g. supermarkets and other commercial establishments, trade fairs and itinerant sales;
  2. CONSTRUCTION e.g. building companies, insulation activities;
  3. REAL ESTATE e.g. real estate agencies, auctions, conveyance;
  4. SERVICES LINKED TO AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY e.g. support activities for crop production such as fumigation services or harvesting services; post-harvesting crop activities; veterinaries and biological laboratories;
  5. SERVICES RELATED TO INDUSTRY e.g. installation and maintenance of machines, industrial cleaning;
  6. EDUCATION SERVICES e.g. private schools and private universities, language schools;
  7. TOURISM AND LEISURE e.g. restaurants, bars, travel agencies, hotels, amusement parks;
  8. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES e.g. lawyers, architects, engineers, veterinaries;
  9. CRAFTS e.g. carpenters, plumbers, frame-makers, repair and maintenance services;
  10. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SERVICES TO BUSINESSES e.g. management consultancy, advertising, certification, testing, training;
  11. SOCIAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY PRIVATE OPERATORS e.g. childcare, care for the elderly, household support;
  12. CULTURE-RELATED SERVICES e.g. private museums and libraries, theatres, concerts, organisation of open air events;
  13. SPORT AND FITNESS e.g. gyms, spas;
  14. SERVICES ANCILLARY TO HEALTHCARE e.g. supply and maintenance of medical equipment, laboratories working for hospitals;
  15. SERVICES RELATED TO, BUT DISTINCT FROM TRANSPORT e.g. car rental, removal services, driving schools, aerial photography, organisation of bus tours;
  16. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RELATED SERVICES, e.g. administration of IP rights by collecting societies, services offered by patent attorneys.

8. Which sectors and services are excluded from the ambit of application of the Services Directive?

The Services Directive does not apply to:

  1. Financial services;
  2. Electronic communications services and networks;
  3. Services in the field of transport (but services which are related to - albeit distinct from- transport, such as driving school services, leisure flights, etc., are covered);
  4. Services of temporary work agencies (but placement and recruitment services are covered);
  5. Healthcare services provided by health professionals to patients to assess, maintain or restore their state of health where those activities are reserved to a regulated health profession (but services that are not directly intended for the treatment of patients – e.g. veterinary services – or are not reserved to a regulated health profession or are provided to healthcare institutions or healthcare staff are covered);
  6. Audiovisual services and radio broadcasting;
  7. Gambling activities;
  8. Social services relating to social housing, childcare and support of families and persons permanently or temporarily in need which are provided by the State, by providers mandated by the State or by charities recognised as such by the State (but when social services are provided by a private operator, they are covered);
  9. private security services (but those services which are not security services as such, for ex. the sale or installation of security devices or the manned monitoring of property or persons from a distance through electronic devices are covered);
  10. services provided by notaries and bailiffs, who are appointed by an official act of government.

These exclusions do not of course make these sectors and services immune to the application of Articles 49 and 56 of the FEU Treaty. Thus, as long as they are services for the purposes of Article 57 FEU Treaty, they may be subject to the rules on freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services under Articles 49 and 56 FEU Treaty, as the case may be.

9. What is the relationship between the Services Directive and other secondary legislation in the field of the European Single Market?

The Services Directive builds upon and applies in parallel to other secondary legislation that is relevant for the services sector. Since the Services Directive was drafted taking into account other Single Market  legislation, conflicts between the former and the latter are unlikely to occur. However, in case a conflict arises between the Services Directive and a provision of another Community act governing specific aspects of access to or exercise of a service activity in specific sectors or for specific professions, the provision of the other Community act shall prevail and shall apply to those specific aspects. 

10. How does establishment differ from free (temporary) provision of services?

The distinction between establishment and free provision of services is important because certain parts of the Services Directive apply only to one or the other. 

  • Establishment means the actual pursuit of an economic activity by a service provider, as referred to in Article 49 of the FEU Treaty, for an indefinite period and through a stable infrastructure from where the business of providing services is actually carried out.
  • Free provisionof services is the exercise of a service activity in a Member State on a temporary basis. It is characterized by the absence of a stable and continuous participation in the economic life of the host Member State by a service provider which is established in another Member State.

The line between these two concepts must be drawn in view of all factual and legal circumstances. The temporary nature of the activity in question has to be determined not only in light of the duration of the provision of the service, but also in light of its regularity, periodicity or continuity. The fact that the provision of services is temporary does not mean that the provider of services within the meaning of the Treaty may not equip himself with some form of infrastructure in the host Member State (including an office, chambers or consulting rooms) in so far as such infrastructure is necessary for the purpose of performing the services in question.

11. Does the Services Directive only apply to cross-border situations (involving more than one Member State)?

Certain sections of the Services Directive apply only to cross-border situations (i.e. situations involving more than one Member State). Indeed, the cross-border element is a condition required under these sections. For example, the "freedom to provide services" clause under Article 16 Services Directive applies only when a service provider established in a Member State provides its services in a different Member State.

On the other hand, other provisions of the Services Directive apply not only to cross-border but also to domestic situations. For example, the entire Chapter II (Administrative Simplification) applies equally to foreign and domestic service providers wishing to set up a new or additional business in a Member State.

12. In which way does the Services Directive simplify and modernize authorisation schemes and procedures?

Under the Services Directive, national procedures and formalities applicable to access to or exercise of a service activity must be examined by Member States and, where not sufficiently simple, must be simplified. The program of administrative simplification and modernization by the Services Directive consists in particular of the following:

  • Providing for a review of national authorisation schemes regarding the establishment of service providers:
    • Member States must revise their authorisation schemes, by examining whether these pursue an overriding reason relating to the public interest, are necessary and are proportionate; where this is not the case, they have to be abolished or modified in conformity with the Services Directive;
    • The national authorisation schemes that are maintained must be governed by criteria that are non-discriminatory, justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest, proportionate to that public interest, clear, unambiguous, objective, made public in advance, transparent and accessible;
    • Authorisations shall in principle enable the provider to have access to the service activity, or to exercise that activity, throughout the national territory;
    • The duration of authorisations shall in principle be unlimited;
    • Failing a response within the applicable time period, the authorisation shall be in principle deemed to have been granted (principle of "tacit agreement").
  • Obliging national administrations to modernize and improve the way they work:
    • Member States asking a service provider to submit a document in the context of an administrative procedure must accept any document submitted by a service provider and issued by another Member State which serves an equivalent purpose;
    • The original or a certified copy/translation, in principle, cannot not be required;
    • The conditions for granting authorisation for a new establishment shall not duplicate requirements and controls which are equivalent or essentially comparable as regards their purpose to those to which the provider is already subject;
    • Authorisation procedures shall be easily accessible and any charges which the applicants may incur from their implementation shall be reasonable and proportionate to the costs of the authorisation procedures in question and shall not exceed the costs of the procedures;
    • National authorities will have to process authorisation procedures as quickly as possible and in any event within a reasonable period which must be fixed and made public in advance.
  • Setting up Points of Single Contact:
    • Information about the requirements and the procedures regarding the access to and the exercise of service activities must be available online through the Points of Single Contact;
    • Completion of all necessary procedures and formalities must be possible online and at a distance through the Points of Single Contact.

13. What are the "Points of Single Contact" and what is their function?

When they need to get information or to complete procedures relating to access to or exercise of a service activity, providers, instead of having to contact a whole series of administrations and public bodies, will only need to turn to one interlocutor, the so-called "Point of Single Contact". The Points of Single Contact are "one-stop shops" that fulfil essentially the two following functions: information dissemination and procedure management/processing. They must in particular:

  1. give information about the requirements as well as the procedures and formalities necessary for the exercise of or access to a service activity in their country (they must give providers a clear overview of all steps they need to take and supply them with procedural assistance and feedback on ongoing procedures);
  2. list the contact details of competent authorities, relevant associations or organisations, and means of redress available in case of dispute;
  3. provide access to public registers and databases on providers and services;
  4. provide the necessary forms online so that the above-mentioned procedures and formalities can be completed electronically and from a distance;
  5. receive the applications filed and redirect them to the competent authority that is responsible;
  6. receive the decisions and replies/requests by the competent authority responsible and communicate them to the applicant.

The Points of Single Contact serve as an interface between the service providers and the competent authorities. Service providers retain the right to contact directly the competent authorities, should they wish to (in other words, they are not obliged to complete administrative formalities through the Points of Single Contact).

It is inherent in the very concept of Points of Single Contact that they provide an efficient and electronic "service" to the benefits of domestic as well as foreign service providers. This entails, in practice, that Points of Single Contact should be organised in a user-friendly and clear way, and provide reliable and up-to-date information. It also entails that the forms to be filled out are the correct ones, that the relevant information and forms are available in a language that is intelligible by the users, and that there is a hotline or help-desk in case of problems or questions. It finally comprises the setting up of electronic procedures.

There may be more than one Point of Single Contact in each Member State, but each of them must be a one-stop-shop for service providers.

14. What is the impact of the Services Directive on requirements regarding the establishment of service providers?

In addition to streamlining authorisation procedures, the Services Directive, by relying on the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on freedom of establishment, lays down specific and detailed rules in the light of which Member States must revise their requirements regarding the establishment of a service provider:

  • National requirements regarding the access to or the exercise of a service activity that are particularly restrictive to the freedom of establishment are black-listed: they must be eliminated by Member States (see list in Article 14 of the Services Directive).
  • Other national requirements that restrict the access to or the exercise of a service activity must be examined and, unless non-discriminatory, justified by an overriding reason of public interest and proportionate, must also be eliminated or amended by Member States (see list in Article 15 of the Services Directive).

15. What does the Services Directive say about the free (temporary) provision of services cross-border?

To understand the freedom to provide services in the Services Directive it is essential to distinguish between establishment and free provision of services.

The Services Directive lays down a "freedom to provide services" clause (Article 16(1)), whereby "Member States shall respect the right of providers to provide services in a Member State other than that in which they are established." This is not a complete novelty to the extent that the freedom to provide services is established in Article 56 of the FEU Treaty, which has direct effect and the scope of which has been developed in the extensive case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

The Services Directive, by building on the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, makes clear that certain restrictions that are particularly detrimental to the freedom to provide services should in principle not be imposed by the host Member State (e.g. obligation on the provider to have an establishment in the territory of the host Member State – see list in Article 16(2) of the Services Directive).

Moreover and most importantly, the Services Directive limits the possibility for the host Member State to impose requirements on incoming service providers: Article 16 of the Services Directive provides that Member States shall not make access to or exercise of a service activity in their territory subject to compliance with any requirement unless it is justified for reasons of: 1) public policy, 2) public security, 3) public health or 4) the protection of the environment.

The Services Directive also makes clear that requirements which may potentially be justified by one of the four above mentioned overriding reasons relating to the public interest may in any case be imposed only if they are non-discriminatory as regards nationality or place of establishment and proportionate (i.e. they are suitable to attain the public interest pursued, do not go beyond what is necessary and cannot be replaced by less restrictive means).

The provisions in the Services Directive about freedom to provide services do not apply to a number of services/matters expressly excluded, listed in Article 17 Services Directive. 

16. What is the administrative cooperation introduced by the Services Directive?

The Services Directive introduces a system of administrative cooperation enabling the competent authorities of different Member States to more effectively supervise service providers across the EU. This will make it more difficult for "rogue" traders to avoid supervision or to circumvent applicable national rules. At the same time, administrative cooperation should help avoid the multiplication of checks on service providers.

Under the Services Directive, Member States will have to, inter alia:

  • reply to information requests by other Member States;
  • carry out checks, inspections and investigations when necessary;
  • send alerts if a service activity could cause serious damage to the health or safety of persons or to the environment.

All this will be done through an electronic system called "The Internal Market Information System" (IMI), which allows to quickly find the competent authorities responsible in other Member States and facilitates the rapid, direct, structured and multilingual exchange of information among competent authorities of different Member States through electronic means.

National public authorities will thus be able to have trust and confidence in each other through a clear set of precise rules regarding administrative co-operation, information exchange and assistance in the European Single Market, so that consumers or the public interests concerned are properly and effectively protected in the case of cross­-border service activities in the EU.

17. Does the Services Directive lead to social dumping or prevent Member States from applying their labour law?

The Services Directive neither leads to social dumping nor facilitates it. To start with, the core rules relating to labour conditions such as rules on minimum wages, maximum work and minimum rest periods, annual leave, health, safety and hygiene at work, protection of women who have recently given birth and of young people, are governed by the law of the host Member State in the case of salaried workers posted from another Member State, as defined in Article 3(1) of Directive 96/71 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services. Thus, the undertaking posting workers must comply with the host Member State's rules about the terms and conditions of employment concerning the matters referred to above.

Moreover, important aspects of social law have been the object of EC legislation (for ex., the directives about the organisation of working time; protection of employees' rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses; protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer).

Under Article 1(6)pdf of the Services Directive, this Directive does not affect labour law, that is any legal or contractual provision concerning employment conditions, working conditions, including health and safety at work and the relationship between employers and workers, which Member States apply in accordance with national law which respects Community law. Equally, this Directive does not affect the social security legislation of the Member States.

Needless to say, when applying their legislation, including in the social field, Member States must comply with the FEU Treaty (in particular Articles 49 and 56 FEU Treaty) as well as EC secondary legislation (for ex., Directive 96/71). This means inter alia that, as the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union indicates, national labour law may not discriminate on the basis of nationality/residence or disproportionately restrict the freedom of establishment or to provide services enshrined respectively in Articles 49 or 56 of the FEU Treaty.

18. What does the Services Directive provide for as regards consumers?

The Services Directive provides for a number of advantageous novelties for service recipients, including in particular consumers, such as:

  1. Abolition of national requirements restricting the use of a service supplied by a provider established in another Member State (e.g. the obligation for service recipients to obtain a specific authorisation to receive services provided from another Member State are prohibited).
  2. Service providers are not allowed to discriminate, in their general conditions of access to a service, amongst recipients on the basis of their nationality or place of residence; this is particularly relevant in the e-commerce context.
  3. Setting-up of a network of assistance bodies which upon request will give persons thinking of using service providers from other Member States general information about the requirements applicable in that other Member State, means of redress and contact details of associations or organisationspdf Choose translations of the previous link  from which providers or recipients may get practical assistance.
  4. Service providers will have to make easily available to recipients key information about themselves and their services, so that service recipients, in particular consumers, will be clearly informed about who they are dealing with, what services are being offered and under what conditions and prices. Service providers must make available to recipients a whole set of information, including the name of the register in which the provider is enrolled and the professional rules applicable (in case of a regulated profession). In this way, consumers and businesses will benefit from being able to make informed decisions when using services from other Member States.

19. What does the Services Directive say about commercial communications by the regulated professions?

The Services Directive provides for the removal of total bans on commercial communications by the regulated professions. At the same time, in the interest of recipients of services, such commercial communications must respect professional rules aiming to ensure the independence, dignity and integrity of the profession and professional secrecy. In any event, national rules in this field must comply with EC law, in particular the principle of proportionality. This means inter alia that, where they limit or regulate commercial communications, rules aiming at ensuring the independence, dignity and integrity of a regulated profession must not go beyond what is necessary.

20. What does the Services Directive say about multidisciplinary activities?

Under the Services Directive, service providers shall not be made subject to prohibitions of multidisciplinary activities unless:

  1. they belong to regulated professions and the prohibition is justified in order to guarantee compliance with the rules governing professional ethics and conduct,
  2. or they are providers of certification, accreditation, technical monitoring, test or trial services,

in so far as is justified in order to ensure their independence and impartiality.

21. When is the deadline for implementation of the Services Directive by Member States?

28 December 2009 was the deadline for implementation of the Services Directive by the Member States. By this date, Member States (central, regional or municipal or other public institutions, as the case may be) had to adopt and put in place all legislative, administrative and practical measures to fully comply with all the obligations ensuing from the Services Directive.

The implementation of the Services Directive required Member States to take both legal and practical measures. As to legal measures, it was essential that the national legislation effectively ensures that the directive is fully applied, that the legal position under national law is sufficiently precise and clear and that the content of the rights and obligations ensuing from the directive is clear both for individuals and for public administration. As to practical measures (for example, setting up Points of Single Contact), Member States had to deliver concrete results.

Member States were also subject to two sets of obligations prior to the expiry of the transposition deadline. First, they were not allowed to introduce any of the requirements related to the establishment of service providers that are listed in Article 15 of the Services Directive, unless it was non-discriminatory, necessary and proportionate and it is notified to the Commission. Second, Member States were not allowed to take any measure liable to seriously compromise the achievement of the results set out by the Services Directive.

22. What happens if by the deadline for implementation the Services Directive has not been transposed yet in a Member State?

If upon expiry of the deadline for implementation, the Services Directive has not yet been correctly and fully implemented, there are several consequences such as:

  1. Direct application: even if not yet fully/correctly implemented, those provisions in the Services Directive that are directly applicable (i.e. their content is unconditional and sufficiently precise) may be invoked by undertakings or citizens against the defaulting Member State and must be applied by national courts and administrations as regards the relationships between individuals and the State.
  2. Interpretation of national law in conformity with the Directive: national law must be interpreted in conformity with the Services Directive. In this context and if needed, national judges may or, if giving a final decision, must refer a preliminary question to the Court of Justice of the European Union, asking for guidance about the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Services Directive.
  3. State liability: individuals may file court actions to recover the damages caused by a sufficiently serious breach (including non-implementation) of the Services Directive by Member States (at national, regional or local level); a breach of a provision is sufficiently serious inter alia where the transposition is completely lacking or where the directive provision that has been belatedly or incorrectly implemented leaves Member States considerably reduced or no discretion in implementing that provision.
  4. Infringement proceedings by the Commission against the defaulting Member States. A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union finding that a Member State has violated a Community Directive has not only significance in that it ascertains a violation of the law and the Member State concerned must comply with it. If the violation persists, it is also the prerequisite for the action by the Commission aiming at condemnation by the ECJ of the defaulting Member State to the payment of penalties and/or lump sums – upon entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the Commission may ask for penalties and/or lump sumps directly in infringement proceedings if the Member State fails to comply with its obligation to notify measures transposing a directive adopted under a legislative procedure such as the Services Directive. Such a judgment also allows individuals to easily prove the sufficiently serious character of an infringement of Community law in actions for State liability.

23. What is the mutual evaluation that Member States must undergo from 2010 onward?

The Services Directive provides for a new instrument, a process of mutual evaluation, which is to be carried out by the Commission together with Member States. The mutual evaluation is different from and goes far beyond a traditional "directive compliance report" by Member States. It constitutes in the first place an opportunity for a joint assessment by the Commission and Member States of the results of the implementation of the Services Directive. Its aims are as follows:

  1. Identify best practices in terms of regulatory approaches for certain issues or services sectors;
  2. Put in place a structured dialogue with Member States with a view to lifting barriers to the European Single Market and, when needed, enhancing convergence of regulatory approaches;
  3. Lay down the basis for further policy development in the services sector.

The mutual evaluation will be based on the results of the screening of national legislation (i.e. the identification, assessment and, when required, modification of requirements affecting service providers) carried out by Member States during the implementation period. These results will be discussed between the Member States. The consultation of stakeholders is also provided for. At the end of the process, the Commission will issue a report to be presented to the Council and the European Parliament.