Navigation path

Recherche

Loading...
  • pdf
    evaluation-report-of-national-strategy-2012-be-wa_fr

    26 nov. 2012 -
    the efficiency and effectiveness of the operational programmes, with the assessment examining the level of use of financial resources; ? the impacts and effects of these programmes in light of the goals and results to be achieved as defined by the strategy. The assessment is based on the guidelines laid out in the policy note by the C.2 Unit of the European Commission’s DG Agriculture and Rural Development.
  • pdf
    action-plan_fr

    09 juil. 2012 -
    does not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Contact: DG Agriculture & Rural Development, Unit C-2 1 2 PLAN D'ACTION Sur le plan européen et mondial, la production oléicole connaît un développement
  • pdf
    anifelt-pp_fr

    20 nov. 2012 -
    quo) - Option 2(A) (Further strengthening of Producer Organisations) - Option 2(B) (Support to new forms of co-operation) - Option 2(C) (Encouragement of co-operation between POs and individual producers) - Option 2(D) (Support for individual producers in regions with low levels of organisation) - Option 3 (Transfer of certain measures to rural development) - Option 4 (Total transfer to the second pillar)
  • pdf
    gepchampi_fr

    20 nov. 2012 -
    its mode of culture, and its agronomic characteristics, the production of cultivated mushrooms. This exclusion is particularly expressed through the extension of certain mechanisms, either under the first pillar (direct aid) or under the rural development (second pillar). This is why, before any analysis or more precise evolution proposal of the Community framework for actions in the fruit and vegetables
  • pdf
    feba_fr

    20 nov. 2012 -
    any of the options suggested in the consultation document? -single choice reply-(optional) Yes If yes, which one-multiple choices reply-(optional) Option 1 (Status quo) - Option 2(C) (Encouragement of co-operation between POs and individual producers) - Option 2(D) (Support for individual producers in regions with low levels of organisation) - Option 3 (Transfer of certain measures to rural development)
  • pdf
    cenaldi_fr

    20 nov. 2012 -
    Option 1 (Status quo) - Option 2(A) (Further strengthening of Producer Organisations) - Option 2(B) (Support to new forms of co-operation) - Option 2(C) (Encouragement of co-operation between POs and individual producers) - Option 2(D) (Support for individual producers in regions with low levels of organisation) - Option 3 (Transfer of certain measures to rural development) - Option 4 (Total transfer
  • pdf
    gefel_fr

    20 nov. 2012 -
    2(B) (Support to new forms of co-operation) - Option 2(C) (Encouragement of co-operation between POs and individual producers) - Option 2(D) (Support for individual producers in regions with low levels of organisation) - Option 3 (Transfer of certain measures to rural development) - Option 4 (Total transfer to the second pillar) Please specify why : Option 1 -open reply-(optional) o Malgré les aspects
  • pdf
    apfel-so_fr

    20 nov. 2012 -
    of Producer Organisations) - Option 2(B) (Support to new forms of co-operation) - Option 2(C) (Encouragement of co-operation between POs and individual producers) - Option 2(D) (Support for individual producers in regions with low levels of organisation) - Option 3 (Transfer of certain measures to rural development) - Option 4 (Total transfer to the second pillar) Please specify why : Option 1 -open
  • pdf
    vbt_fr

    20 nov. 2012 -
    to new forms of co-operation) - Option 2(C) (Encouragement of co-operation between POs and individual producers) - Option 2(D) (Support for individual producers in regions with low levels of organisation) - Option 3 (Transfer of certain measures to rural development) - Option 4 (Total transfer to the second pillar) - The option you have suggested in reply to question 2 Please specify why : Option 1
  • pdf
    fnsacc-01_fr

    20 nov. 2012 -
    forms of co-operation) - Option 2(C) (Encouragement of co-operation between POs and individual producers) - Option 2(D) (Support for individual producers in regions with low levels of organisation) - Option 3 (Transfer of certain measures to rural development) - Option 4 (Total transfer to the second pillar) Please specify why : Option 1 -open reply-(optional) Option 1 :Depuis 1996 les producteurs et