As local storage is disabled, automatic saving is not possible
EUSurvey EUSurvey     All public surveys  
Login | About | Support | Download | Documentation
Views
Normal  Enhanced Contrast

Languages
English  
Identification process Questionnaire UBL 2.1

Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Pages
The profile of the respondent

The profile of the respondent

Received contributions may be published on the Commission's website, with the identification of the contributor. Do you agree with your contribution being published under your name?*



Which EU country are you based in?Which EU country are you based in?*




























Are you responding to this consultation as:Are you responding to this consultation as:*







The technical part

The technical part

Do you agree with the conclusions of the evaluation report of the MSP on the market acceptance of the ULB 2.1 technical specification?




Do you agree with the conclusions of the evaluation report of the MSP on the coherence of the ULB 2.1 technical specification?




Do you agree with the conclusions of the evaluation report of the MSP on the characteristics of the organisation developing the UBL 2.1 technical specification?




Do you agree with the conclusions of the evaluation report of the MSP on the organisation process to develop the UBL 2.1 technical specification, namely regarding openness, consensus and transparency?




Do you agree with the conclusions of the evaluation report of the MSP on the maintenance of the published UBL 2.1 technical specification?




Do you agree with the conclusions of the evaluation report of the MSP on the availability of the resulting UBL 2.1 technical specification?




Do you agree with the conclusions of the evaluation report of the MSP on the IPR licensing regime of the UBL 2.1 technical specifications?




Do you agree with the conclusions of the evaluation report of the MSP on the relevance of the UBL 2.1 technical specification?




Do you agree with the conclusions of the evaluation report of the MSP on the neutrality and stability of the UBL 2.1 technical specification?




Do you agree with the conclusions of the evaluation report of the MSP on the quality of the UBL 2.1 technical specification?




Any other comments
Submit Save as Draft