R & D expenditure


Data extracted in February 2017. Most recent data: Further Eurostat information, Main tables and Database. Planned article update: January 2018.
Figure 1: Gross domestic expenditure on R & D, 2005–2015
(% of GDP)
Source: Eurostat (tsc00001)
Figure 2: Gross domestic expenditure on R & D, 2005 and 2015
(% of GDP)
Source: Eurostat (rd_e_gerdtot)
Figure 3: Gross domestic expenditure on R & D by sector, EU-28, 2005–2015
(% of GDP)
Source: Eurostat (rd_e_gerdtot)
Figure 4: Gross domestic expenditure on R & D by sector, 2015
(% of GDP)
Source: Eurostat (rd_e_gerdtot)
Figure 5: Gross domestic expenditure on R & D by source of funds, EU-28, 2004–2014
(% of total gross expenditure on R & D)
Source: Eurostat (rd_e_fundgerd)
Figure 6: Gross domestic expenditure on R & D by source of funds, 2015
(% of total gross expenditure on R & D)
Source: Eurostat (rd_e_fundgerd)

This article presents data on research and development (R & D) expenditures within the European Union (EU), according to the sector of performance and the source of funds. The data are obtained through statistical surveys which are regularly conducted at national level covering R & D performing entities in the private and public sectors.

One of the key aims of the EU during the last couple of decades has been to encourage increasing levels of investment, in order to provide a stimulus to the EU’s competitiveness. The Europe 2020 strategy adopted in 2010 maintains a long-standing objective, namely, for the EU to devote 3 % of gross domestic product (GDP) to R & D activities; this is one of the five key targets of the Europe 2020 strategy.

Main statistical findings

Gross domestic expenditure on R & D (GERD) stood at EUR 299 billion in the EU-28 in 2015, which was a 4.4 % increase on the year before, and 47.8 % higher than 10 years earlier (in 2005) — note that these rates of change are in current prices and so reflect price changes as well as real changes in the level of expenditure. In 2013, the level of expenditure on R & D in the EU-28 was equivalent to 80 % of that recorded by the United States. In 2014, the EU-28’s R & D expenditure was 80 % higher than in China, more than double the expenditure in Japan, and more than six times as high as in South Korea.

In order to make figures more comparable, GERD is often expressed relative to GDP — see Figure 1 — or in relation to population. The ratio of GERD to GDP, one of five key Europe 2020 strategy indicators, is also known as R & D intensity. This ratio increased modestly in the EU-28 during the period from 2005 to 2007, rising from 1.74 % to 1.77 %. Between 2007 and 2012 it increased more rapidly, reaching 2.01 %, despite a period of stagnation in 2010; R & D intensity increased slightly to 2.03 % in 2013 and remained almost unchanged in 2014 and 2015. Despite the increases observed in recent years, the EU-28’s R & D expenditure relative to GDP remained well below the corresponding ratios recorded in Japan (3.59 %, 2014 data) and the United States (2.73 %, 2013 data), as it has for a lengthy period of time. In 2014, R&D intensity in China surpassed that of the EU-28, with Chinese R & D expenditure equivalent to 2.05 % of GDP.

Between 2005 and 2008 there was an increase in the relative importance of GERD in the Japanese economy, as its ratio to GDP rose by 0.16 percentage points; note that Japanese economic growth was relatively subdued during this period. However, in the period between 2008 and 2010 the ratio of GERD to GDP in the Japanese economy fell by 0.22 percentage points, before bouncing back between 2010 and 2014, with a relative peak in the latest period for which data are available. In the United States, the ratio of GERD to GDP grew from 2.51 % in 2005 to a peak of 2.82 % in 2009, a rise of 0.31 percentage points. In 2010, R & D intensity in the United States fell back to 2.74 %, after which it remained relatively unchanged through to 2013 (2.73 %). China’s R & D intensity increased rapidly during the period shown in Figure 1, rising from 1.32 % in 2005 to 2.05 % by 2014, an increase of 0.73 percentage points.

Among the EU Member States, the highest R & D intensities in 2015 were recorded in Sweden (3.26 %), Austria (3.07 %) and Denmark (3.03 %) — see Figure 2. These were the only Member States to report a level of R & D intensity that was above 3.00 % in 2015; note that the ratio fell from above to below 3.00 % in Finland between 2005 and 2015. There were seven Member States that reported R & D expenditure that was below 1.00 % of their GDP in 2015. Along with Greece, the Member States with the lowest R & D intensities were ones that joined the EU in 2004 or more recently, although it should be noted that Slovenia (2.21 %) reported an R & D intensity above the EU-28 average, while the Czech Republic (1.95 %), Estonia (1.50 %), Hungary (1.38 %), Slovakia (1.18 %), Lithuania (1.04 %) and Poland (1.00 %) reported intensities of at least 1.00 %.

Nearly all EU Member States reported a higher R & D intensity in 2015 than in 2005, the exceptions being the two Member States with the highest intensities in 2005, Finland (-0.43 percentage points) and Sweden (-0.13 points), as well as Luxembourg (-0.28 points), while there was almost no change in R & D intensity in Croatia during the period under consideration. At the other end of the range, the biggest increases in R & D intensity (in percentage point terms) between 2005 and 2015 were recorded in Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Austria, Slovakia and Belgium.

R & D expenditure by sector of performance

Figure 3 shows how the EU-28’s R & D intensity grew between 2005 and 2014 — identifying the share of R & D performed in each of four sectors — after which there was a slight reduction in the intensity rate in 2015. Throughout the period under consideration (2005–2015), the majority of R & D expenditure was in the business enterprise sector, and its R & D intensity rose from 1.10 % of GDP in 2005 to 1.30 % in 2014 and 2015, an overall increase of 18.2 %. The second largest sector performing R & D was the higher education sector, whose R & D intensity increased 23.1 % between 2005 and 2014, to reach 0.48 % of GDP, before falling marginally in 2015. The R & D intensities of the two other sectors changed little over the period under consideration, and in 2015 the R & D intensity of the government sector was 0.24 % of GDP, while that of the private non-profit sector was 0.02 %.

The differences in the relative importance of R & D expenditure between countries are often explained in part by levels of expenditure within the business enterprise sector as can be seen in Figure 4. While the R & D conducted within the business enterprise sector was equivalent to 1.30 % of the EU-28’s GDP in 2015, in South Korea this share reached 3.35 % (2014 data), in Japan it was 2.79 % (2014 data), in Switzerland it was 2.06 % (2012 data) and in the United States it was 1.92 % (2013 data). The relative importance of R & D expenditure in the government and higher education sectors was broadly similar in the EU-28 and across all of these non-member countries, except for Switzerland where the government sector’s R & D intensity was close to zero and that of the higher education sector was relatively high.

An evaluation of the data for the EU Member States also confirms that those countries with relatively high ratios of business enterprise expenditure on R & D relative to GDP — namely, Sweden (2.27 %), Austria (2.18 %), Germany (1.95 %), Finland (1.94 %) and Denmark (1.87 %) — also reported relatively high overall R & D intensities (2.87 % or above). Apart from Germany, the other four of these Member States also featured at the top of the ranking of expenditure by the higher education sector, where the Netherlands and Estonia also had a relatively high ratio of R & D expenditure to GDP. Government R & D expenditure relative to GDP was highest in Germany, Luxembourg and the Czech Republic, while private non-profit sector R & D expenditure relative to GDP was very low in each of the Member States, peaking at 0.07 % in Cyprus.

R & D expenditure by source of funds

An analysis of R & D expenditure by source of funds shows that more than half (55.3 %) of the total expenditure in 2014 within the EU-28 was funded by business enterprises, while almost one third (32.3 %) was funded by government, and a further 10.0 % from abroad (foreign funds). Funding by the higher education and private non-profit sectors was relatively small, 0.8 % and 1.6 % of the total respectively. These shares were relatively stable over time as can be seen from Figure 5. The main developments over the period 2004 to 2014 were a fall in the share of funding by the government sector, no change in the share for the private non-profit sector, and increases for the three other sectors, most notably (in relative terms) for R & D funding from abroad (its share increasing overall by 19.0 %).

In the Asian economies of South Korea, Japan and China, business-funded R & D accounted for a larger share of total R & D expenditure than in the EU-28, close to three quarters of the total in 2014. In the United States (60.9 %; 2013 data) and Switzerland (60.8 %; 2012 data) the shares of business-funded R & D were closer to the EU-28 average (see Figure 6).

Among the EU Member States, in 2015 business-funded R & D accounted for more than three fifths of total R & D expenditure in Slovenia (69.2 %), Germany (65.8 %; 2014 data) and Sweden (61.0 %; 2013 data). By contrast, a majority of the expenditure on R & D made in Cyprus (56.5 %; 2014 data) and Greece (52.7 %) was funded by the government sector. There were also considerable differences in the relative importance of R & D funding from abroad, with relatively high shares — in excess of 30.0 % in 2015 — reported in Bulgaria (50.9 %; 2014 data), Latvia (45.0 %), Slovakia (39.4 %), Lithuania (34.6 %), the Czech Republic (32.5 %) and Luxembourg (32.3 %; 2013 data). The higher education sector played a relatively small role in funding R & D expenditure in most Member States, exceeding 4.0 % only in the southern Member States of Cyprus (5.6 %; 2014 data), Portugal (4.2 %; 2014 data) and Spain (4.1 %; 2014 data). Equally, the role of the private non-profit sector was also generally small, exceeding 3.0 % of R & D expenditure in the United Kingdom (4.8 %), Denmark (4.5 %) and Sweden (3.1 %; 2013 data).

Data sources and availability

Statistics on science, technology and innovation are based on Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology. The Decision was implemented by the European Commission as Regulation (EC) No 753/2004 on statistics on science and technology which was adopted in 2004. In 2012, a new European Commission Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was adopted.

Eurostat’s statistics on R & D expenditure are compiled using guidelines laid out in the Frascati manual, published in 2002 by the OECD. R & D expenditure is a basic measure that covers intramural expenditure, in other words, all expenditures for R & D that are performed within a statistical unit or sector of the economy in the EU Member States.

The main analysis of R & D statistics is by four institutional sectors of performance. These four sectors are the business enterprise sector, the government sector, the higher education sector, and the private non-profit sector. Gross domestic expenditure on R & D (GERD) is composed of expenditure from each of these four sectors. Expenditure data considers the research performed on the national territory, regardless of the source of funds; data are usually expressed in relation to GDP and this ratio is often referred to as R & D intensity. Additional analysis of R & D expenditure are available by: source of funds (for which data are also available from a fifth sector, funding from abroad); field of science; type of costs; economic activity (NACE); enterprise size class; type of R & D; socioeconomic objectives; and regions (NUTS).

Context

Through its innovation union flagship initiative (which forms part of the Europe 2020 strategy) the European Commission has placed renewed emphasis on the conversion of Europe’s scientific expertise into marketable products and services, through seeking to use public sector intervention to stimulate the private sector and to remove bottlenecks which stop such ideas reaching the market. Furthermore, the latest revision of the integrated economic and employment guidelines (revised in 2015 as part of the Europe 2020 strategy) includes a guideline to optimise support for R & D and innovation, strengthening the knowledge triangle between research, innovation and education; it is hoped that this will provide a stimulus for a further expansion of the digital economy.

The European Commission compiles three levels of indicators to support research and innovation policymaking. These may be grouped together as: the headline indicator; innovation union scoreboard (or core) indicators; and a comprehensive set of other indicators. The headline indicator is the 3.00 % target for research intensity to be reached within the EU by 2020; this is one of five Europe 2020 headline indicators being tracked within the Europe 2020 strategy. The scoreboard indicators are designed to monitor research and innovation for the Competitiveness Council, while the comprehensive set of other indicators are for in-depth economic analytical purposes and European Commission services to produce an innovation union competitiveness report.

One area that has received considerable attention in recent years is the structural difference in R & D funding between Europe and its main competitors. Policymakers in Europe have tried to increase R & D business expenditure so that it is more in line with relative contributions observed in Japan or the United States. The European Research Area (ERA) is designed to overcome some of the barriers that are thought to have hampered European research efforts, for example, by addressing geographical, institutional, disciplinary and sectoral boundaries.

In December 2008, the Competitiveness Council adopted a vision for the ERA. According to its opening statement, all players should benefit from: the ‘fifth freedom’, introducing the free circulation of researchers, knowledge and technology across the ERA; attractive conditions for carrying out research and investing in R & D intensive sectors; Europe-wide scientific competition, together with the appropriate level of cooperation and coordination. The 2020 vision for the ERA is part of the wider picture of Europe’s 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.

In November 2011, the European Commission presented a successor for the 7th framework programme by announcing Horizon 2020, a programme for investing nearly EUR 80 billion in research and innovation, implementing the innovation union. Horizon 2020 focuses on turning scientific breakthroughs into innovative goods and services that have the potential to provide business opportunities and change people’s lives for the better. Running from 2014 to 2020 this programme is part of the EU’s drive to create new growth and jobs in Europe.

See also

Further Eurostat information

Publications

Main tables

Research and development (t_research)
Statistics on research and development (t_rd)
Research and development expenditure, by sectors of performance (tsc00001)
Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) by source of funds (tsc00031)

Database

Research and development (research)
Statistics on research and development (rd)
R&D expenditure at national and regional level (rd_e)
Government budget appropriations or outlays on R&D (gba)
Total GBAORD by NABS 2007 socio-economic objectives (gba_nabsfin07)
Total GBAORD by NABS 1992 socio-economic objectives (gba_nabsfin92)
Total GBAORD as a % of total general government expenditure (gba_nabste)

Dedicated section

Methodology / Metadata

Manual

ESMS metadata

Source data for tables and figures (MS Excel)

Other information

External links