Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistics Norway


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistics Norway

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Statistics Norway

1.5. Contact mail address

Statistics Norway, PB 2633 St. Hanshaugen, NO-0131 Oslo, Norway


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 27/02/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 27/02/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 27/02/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on higher education R&D (HERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the higher education sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the higher education sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector.

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics(EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics) complements this with guidelines for further harmonisation among EU, EFTA and candidate countries.

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
  • The local unit for the statistics are compiled at regional level according to NUTS 2 – Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics;
  • The distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) are based on Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS);
  • The fields of research and development are based on Classification and distribution by Fields of Research and Development (FORD).
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
N/A  
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D Coverage of GERD and total R&D personnel resources is in accordance with Frascati Manual definitions.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD) Data cover all major fields of research and development in accordance with FM. On national level data are available on 2-digit level, and for some fields of R&D – also on 3-digit level.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Higher education sector  
     Tertiary education institution  Included
     University and colleges: core of the sector  Included
     University hospitals and clinics  Included
     HES Borderline institutions  Included
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to HES  No
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities Personnel providing direct services, e.g. R&D managers, administrators, staff at central research libraries and electronic data processing centres are included. From 1991 onwards personnel in central administration units of higher education are excluded; however the cost of such personnel is included in other current R&D expenditure (in line with the Frascati Manual).
External R&D personnel In the higher education sector, all doctoral students employed by and receiving salaries from the higher education units (GUF and all other sources) are included in the data. The higher education institutions have the employers liability for doctoral students regardless of funding. The R&D share of their working time is based on the time-use survey, for 2021-numbers the time-use survey from 2020-2021 is used. Master students are only included when they are on the on the pay-roll of the higher education institutions (not usual).
Clinical trials  No special effort has been made to deal with clinical trials.
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability  Mostly available
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability  Not avaiable
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  No
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Full survey every second calendar year (odd-numbered years). Questionnaire prefilled with accounting data from the higher education institutions are sent to institute/department level at the higher education institutions.
Source of funds  Source of funds In line with FM. Data on internal/external are collected (almost everything is external for HES). No data on transfer/exchange funds yet.
Type of R&D  In line with FM. Available every second year; main survey years (odd-numbered years).
Type of costs  In line with FM, but no information on capitalised computer software or other intellectual property products.
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  Not Avaiable
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  Calendar year (per October 1), also available in the years between survey years.
Function  Researchers and support staff. Classified according to employment category.
Qualification Available. 
Age  Available.
Citizenship  Available on ad hoc basis (some survey years). Plans for including this on a regular basis. 
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  Calendar year, totals for the years between survey years
Function  Researchers and other support staff (based on employment categories of HC).
Qualification  not available
Age  not available
Citizenship  not available
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

In HES based on time-use survey and information from R&D survey. 

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 N/A    
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit is the institutional unit as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993, if there are deviations please explain.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population of institutional units.

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective, the target population for the national R&D survey of the HES Sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including known R&D performers or assumed to perform R&D). In practise however, countries in their R&D surveys might have difficulty in identifying R&D activities at the municipality level. 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  All HE institutions known or supposed to perform R&D.  
Estimation of the target population size    
3.7. Reference area

Not requested. R&D statistics cover national and regional data.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested. The base year for the unit Purchasing Power Standard (PPS) and PPS per inhabitant at constant prices is currently 2005. All calculations of non-basic unit (national currencies) are done by Eurostat.


4. Unit of measure Top

Expenditure: NOK 1000

External R&D personnel: number of persons

Type of R&D: per cent


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year, odd years.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations Statistics Norway produces statistics in line with European statistics code of practice. 
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  No, but there is a statistical programme where R&D statistics is mentioned together with all other national statistics.
Legal acts  The statistics are developed, produced and disseminated pursuant to Act no. 32 of 21 June 2019 relating to official statistics and Statistics Norway (the Statistics Act).
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Statistics Norway produce R&D statistic for all R&D performing sectors in Norway.
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  
Planned changes of legislation  
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

 Yes

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

Yes

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

We follow Eurostat Code of practice and make sure it is not possible to identify units at detailed level. Behind every cell in tables, statistical data there must be at least 3 units. Exceptions may occur when data cover public institutions, data is publicly available, or by consent. In cases of doubt, this is decided in each case.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Calendar available on website.

8.2. Release calendar access

At our website under New statistics: https://www.ssb.no/en

8.3. Release policy - user access

Data available for all users at the same time. 


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Every second year (odd years) and main figures annually. 


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Y  The release of the data is made public through a newsletter (preliminary and final figures).
Ad-hoc releases  Y  New statistical products or special studies (i.e. on corona influence on R&D).

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y

Figures are also made available through the publication “Report on Science & Technology Indicators for Norway”. Variables for all performing sectors as well as time series; https://www.forskningsradet.no/indikatorrapporten/.

Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 Y

On an irregular basis shorter articles or reports are produced (i.e. in Forskningspolitikk («Research Policy» an independent Norwegian magazine for analysis and debate on research, innovation and higher education in Norway and the Nordic area).

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Statistics Norway has an online statdata bank with figures on R&D. https://www.ssb.no/en/teknologi-og-innovasjon/forskning-og-innovasjon-i-naeringslivet/statistikk/forskning-og-utvikling-i-universitets-og-hogskolesektoren 

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Upon request
Access cost policy  Full cost
Micro-data anonymisation rules  Micro-data from the R&D statistics is available to researchers if rules and regulations are met.
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y  Aggregate figures  Main results available at Statistics Norway´s websites.
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Y  Microdata / aggregate figures  
Other  N    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Methodology of R&D survey described at webpage https://www.ssb.no/en/teknologi-og-innovasjon/forskning-og-innovasjon-i-naeringslivet/statistikk/forskning-og-utvikling-i-universitets-og-hogskolesektoren. "About the statistics".

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)  Metadata is published as a parallel to the press release. The press release addressess key points and comparisons over time. Information is further ensured by, including contact persons' names, phone numbers and e-mail addresses. Furthermore, figures accompany key tables for clarity purposes.
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues Sometimes by email or at user meetings. Most problematic issues are questions on comparability between countries.
Measure to increase clarity We generally face clarity question on request, no immediate plans for further actions besides continuously updating the websites.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data  Good


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

R&D statistics are compiled according to OECD Frascati Manual 2015.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The methodology for R&D statistics in the HES is considered to be of high quality. Compilation includes extensive quality control and testing, comparisons with previous surveys as well as with data from other sources.
The web questionnaires are to a high degree prefilled with institutions’ accounting data. Ongoing work to improve accounting data for this purpose, cooperation with HEI on this.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1 The Research Council of Norway  Data used for benchmarking, research policy issues, evaluations
 1  Ministry of Education and Research  Data used for policy assessment and policy creation
1  Ministry of Health and Care Services   Monitor R&D in hospitals, develop strategies for R&D
1  Other ministries  Data used for policy assessment and policy creation
1 Committee for Gender Balance and Diversity in Research (KIF) Data on gender and diversity in reserach personnel to improve balance
 2  Trade union for researchers, knowledge workers and students  Data used for policy creation
 3  Media oriented towards research policy  Data to inform policy

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction Statistics Norway does not undertake a national user satisfaction survey per se. Instead, meetings are held with key users. At these meetings the users are encouraged to evaluate previous surveys, as well as suggest changes or amendments to future surveys.
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics No
Short description of the feedback received There is always a request for more detailed breakdowns, often more details than we can deliver. This refers most often to data on specific subjects. In such cases we often conduct additional surveys to the ordinary R&D surveys and combine the data. Users often want data at an earlier stage, that means before data are released. Often conflict between user needs and response burden. But the users are satisfied with R&D statistics in the HES. In 2023 we published HERD earlier than before and we launched several new statistics on an annual basis, i.e. on diversity in research personnel and a monitoring system for researcher recruitment in Norway.
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

not available

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197. The Regulation (EU) stipulates periodicity of variables that should be provided, breakdowns and if they should be provided mandatory or on voluntary basis.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables            
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure  x          
Optional data on R&D expenditure    x        
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  x          
Optional data on R&D personnel  x          
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel    x        

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds Y-1970  biennial, total annual        
Type of R&D  Y-1970  biennial        
Type of costs  Y-1970  biennial, total annual        
Socioeconomic objective  N-1970-2005  biennial until 2005        
Region  Y-1970  biennial        
FORD  Y-1970  biennial        
Type of institution  Y-1970  biennial        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1961  biennial        
Function  Y-1961  biennial        
Qualification  Y-1961  biennial        
Age  Y-1961  biennial        
Citizenship  Ad hoc, plans to include annualy Ad hoc, plans to include annually        
Region  Y-1961  biennial        
FORD  Y-1961  biennial        
Type of institution  Y-1961  biennial        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  N (can be estimated)  biennial        
Function  Y-1961  biennial        
Qualification  N  biennial        
Age  N  biennial        
Citizenship  N  biennial        
Region  Y-1961  biennial        
FORD  Y-1961  biennial        
Type of institution  Y-1961  biennial        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
 Thematic and technology areas  1995  biennial  18    

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional').

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  -  -  -  1  2  -  +/-
Total R&D personnel in FTE  -  -  1  1  -  1  +/-
Researchers in FTE  -  -  1  1  -  1  +/-

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure  x        
Total R&D personnel in FTE  x        
Researchers in FTE  x        

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys. Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

not available

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by source of funds
Source of funds R&D expenditure
Business enterprise  N/A
Government  N/A
Higher education  N/A
Private non-profit  N/A
Rest of the world  N/A
Total  N/A
13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by function and qualification
    R&D personnel (FTE)
Function Researchers  N/A
Technicians  N/A
Other support staff  N/A
Qualification ISCED 8  N/A
ISCED 5-7  N/A
ISCED 4 and below  N/A
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

We conduct a full survey of all known institutions performing R&D in the Higher education sector.  

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 N/A

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

As far as we know all units included belong to the target population.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect: 

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

-Unit non-response which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

-Item non-response which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates. 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfactory by computing the un-weighted response rate.

Definition: Eligible are the survey units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with certain units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’.

Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted unit non-response rate
Number of units with a response in the survey Total number of units in the survey Unit non-response rate (Un-weighted)
 316  368  52
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item Non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
R&D variable/breakdown Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%) Comments
R&D expenditure  15%  Census survey
R&D personnel in FTE  15%  Census survey
Researchers in FTE  15%  Census survey
13.3.3.3. Measures to increase response rate

In advance of every new datacollection we work on improvement of clearity in the questionnaire (design, language, technical), guidelines, websites. We inform the HEIs and have contact persons for survey and accounting data, arrange meeting with most of the HEIs. We support the respondents, contact them for missing/strange answers, arrange workshops and send out several reminders. 

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied Some of the data is entered manually from questionnaire and directly into the R&D database. Punching errors may occur, but the errors are minimized through control and testing and cannot be estimated.
Estimates of data entry errors  Automatic controls have reduced errors to a minimum, not possible to estimate.
Variables for which coding was performed  Source of funds
Estimates of coding errors Punching errors may occur, but the errors are minimized through control and testing and cannot be estimated. We work on further minimizing errors through increased use of programming. 
Editing process and method  Editing is performed both manually and automatically.
Procedure used to correct errors

After receiving the questionnaires from the units, figures are checked thoroughly. This reduces the number of errors to a minimum. During the data revision, answers from previous surveys are used as a reference.

Consistency checks are undertaken. Where discrepancies are found, the auditor either corrects obvious mistakes, or contacts the units to rule out mistakes and misconceptions.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 26.10.2022

c) Lag (days): 299

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 26.10.2022

c) Lag (days): 299

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) T+10 T+18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  T+10  T+10
Delay (days)     
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

As far as we know, we are in line with the Frascati Manual.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197  or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts/issues.

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).  No  
Researcher FM2015, § 5.35-5.39.  No  
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, § 5.58-5.61 (in combination with Eurostat'EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, § 5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25  No  
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015, Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).  No  
Statistical unit FM2015 §3.70 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Target population FM2015 §9.6 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Sector coverage FM2015 §3.67-3.69 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No   
Post-secondary (non university / college) education institutions FM2015 §9.12 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Hospitals and clinics FM2015 §9.13-9.17,  §9.109-9.112 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Borderline research institutions FM2015 §9.13-9.17,  §9.109-9.112 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Major fields of science and technology coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No  
Reference period Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No  
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection method  No  
Survey questionnaire / data collection form  No  
Cooperation with respondents  No  
Coverage of external funds  No  
Distinction between GUF and other sources – Sector considered as source of funds for GUF  No  
Data processing methods  No  
Treatment of non-response  No  
Variance estimation  No  
Method of deriving R&D coefficients  No  
Quality of R&D coefficients  No  
Data compilation of final and preliminary data  No  In 2021 our preliminary data = final data.
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)   1991

2007

1991 Personnel in central administration units of higher education are not included; however, the cost of such personnel is included in other current R&D expenditure (in line with the Frascati Manual).

2007 New survey method for hospitals

  Function   See above See above
  Qualification   See above See above
R&D personnel (FTE)   1991

2007

1991 Personnel in central administration units of higher education are not included; however, the cost of such personnel is included in other current R&D expenditure (in line with the Frascati Manual).

2007 New survey method for hospitals

  Function    See above  See above
  Qualification    See above  See above
R&D expenditure   1991

2007

1991 Personnel in central administration units of higher education are not included; however, the cost of such personnel is included in other current R&D expenditure (in line with the Frascati Manual).

2007 New survey method for hospitals

Source of funds   See above See above
Type of costs   See above See above
Type of R&D      
Other      

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Are the data produced in the same way in the odd and even years? If no, please explain the main differences.

HERD are based on a biennual survey with detailed statistics for odd years. In even years main figures are produced based on annual update of research personnel data and accounting data.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics. The education statistics (UNESCO/OECD/Eurostat (UOE)) include R&D expenditure in tertiary educational institutions and follow the recommendations of the Frascati manual regarding the definition of R&D expenditure. Due to the differences in the coverage some differences in the two datasets (UOE questionnaire and the R&D HES surveys) are expected. However, there is a need to ensure that a harmonised approach is used for compiling data in the two domains. The two statistical domains should aim for a consistent use of R&D coefficients for splitting teaching and research time.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not available

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
 N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A
15.3.4. Coherence – Education statistics

In Norway, almost all academic personnel are involved in both R&D and teaching activities. Differences in data are related to the different data sources: For UOE Statistics Norway is collecting data from Database for Statistics on Higher Education (DBH), the administrative systems of various higher education institutions, and the State Education Loan Fund". UOE data include more position categories than R&D statistics which is also based on data collected from the higher education institutions and DBH. A few small institutions with very little R&D are included in UOE data but not in R&D statistics. In UOE data positions with very low vacancy rates are included (<25%). In R&D statistics (according to guidelines) these positions are excluded, but university hospitals are included.

The difference in expenditure is related to the above-mentioned differences in personnel and institutions included. For UOE financial reports from central and local governments are compiled in accordance with the European System of Accounts (ESA95) and Classification of the functions of government (COFOG). R&D statistics are based on survey data and administrative data as described in the metadata.

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure – HERD (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)      
Final data (delivered T+18)      
Difference (of final data)      
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost¨in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  N/A  0
Data collection costs  N/A  0
Other costs  N/A  0
Total costs  N/A  0
Comments on costs
 It is not possible to calculate the costs for producing R&D statistics in the Higher education sector. This activity is integrated in other tasks, and the persons involved in compiling the statistics work on other projects as well.

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

It is difficult to calculate the costs for producing R&D statistics in the HES separately. The activity is integrated in other tasks, and the people involved in compiling the statistics work on other statistics and projects as well.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  N/A  N/A
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  N/A  N/A
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  N/A  N/A
Total cost  N/A  N/A

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

In case we need to revise figures, we would do so. We have only had minor revisions.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

If needed, we add footnotes to revised numbers in the databank and other tables and make it public.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  R&D survey in HES
Type of survey  Census. Questionnaire. Prefilled with accounting data. Administrative data (accounts, funding data, data on research personnel) in years between total survey years (every second year).
Combination of sample survey and census data  
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  

Time-use surveys are conducted every fifth year.

    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  
Variables the survey contributes to  R&D expenditure and R&D personnel (HC, FTE)
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  All higher education units with R&D    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)      
Stratification variable classes      
Population size 32 higher education institutions and 6 health trusts (university hospitals) (2021)    
Planned sample size  All 32 institutions at department/institute level plus 6 health trusts (university hospitals)    
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)      
Survey frame      
Sample design      
Sample size      
Survey frame quality      
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  Administrative data collected from higher education institutions that are used to prefill the R&D questionnaires to the institute/department level. Administrative data also from the Research Council of Norway (and other funding agencies, medical foundations).
Description of collected data / statistics  Accounting data and personnel data from higher education institutions.
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  Detailed accounting data only in odd years, personnel data every year.
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Information provider

 - Each university/college institute/department.

 - Central government accounting system.

- Central university/college/university hospital administrations.

- Funding bodies, such as the Research Council of Norway and private funds and foundations, mostly within the health sciences.

- The Directorate of Public Construction and Property.

Description of collected information  1. Each university/college institute/department:

Type of R&D, Fields of research and development, Thematic priorities and Technology areas (from 2005).
External R&D expenditure by source of funds and type of costs, external R&D personnel, PhD’s awarded abroad.

2. Time-use survey

3. Central government accounting system:
Accounts for Higher education institutions, collected through Database for Statistics on Higher Education (DBH).

4. Central university/college/university hospital administrations
Personnel data, accounting data

5. Financing bodies:
The Research Council of Norway: Personnel and funding data
Private funds and foundations (mostly within the health sciences): Personnel and funding data

6. The Directorate of Public Construction and Property:
Data on investments in land and buildings for higher education institutions and university hospitals

Data collection method  1. Each university/college institute/department: Questionnaires sent to heads of institutes/departments

2. Time-use quesitonnaire to each tenured person in HES approximately every 5. year (last for 2016)

3. Central government accounting system:
Accounting data electronically received via contact person (used to prefill questionnaire)

4. Central university/college/university hospital administrations
Personnel data, accounting data electronically received.

5. Funding bodies:
The Research Council of Norway: Personnel and funding data received electronically.
Private funds and foundations (mostly within the health sciences): Personnel and funding data
received electronically or by mail.

6. Directorate of Public Construction and Property:
Data on investments in land and buildings for higher education institutions and university hospitals received
by mail.

Time-use surveys for the calculation of R&D coefficients  Time-use questionnaire to each tenured person in HES approximately every 5. year (last for 2021)
Realised sample size (per stratum)  
Mode of data collection (face-to-face interviews; telephone interviews; postal surveys, etc.)  
Incentives used for increasing response  
Follow-up of non-respondents  Non-respondents are contacted by e-mail and phone.
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)  
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  


Annexes:
Under Rapporteringsmateriell, see Guidance to questionnaire in English (PDF) and Questionnaire in English (PDF)
18.4. Data validation

Statistics are compared with with previous years and are confronted with other relevant data (both internal and external) inconsistencies in the statistics are also investigated.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

N/A

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  In the years between survey years R&D statistics are compiled/estimated from personnel data and R&D coefficients (from the latest survey), accounting data. We also receive expenditure and personnel data from the Research Council of Norway. Data on investments in land and buildings come from the Directorate of Public Construction and Property.
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  Preliminary R&D statistics have been compiled/estimated by the same methods as Final data (between survey years), see above. For 2021 preliminary R&D statistics have been = final statistics.
18.5.3. Methodology for derivation of R&D coefficients
National methodology for their derivation.  Time-use survey to tenured personnel at higher education institutions, R&D coefficients are calculated from these data.
Revision policy for the coefficients  In accordance with FM2015 we will conduct time-use surveys with maximum five year´s intervals. Survey in use for 2021 figures was conducted for 2021. The next survey is planned for the academic year 2024-2025.
Issues that affect their quality (e.g. date of last update, aggregation level at which they are computed, etc).  Decreasing response rate.
18.5.4. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  By geographical location
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items HES: time-use-surveys approximately every fifth year (2021 and  next for 2024-2025).
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures Excl. depreciation (in the guidelines).
Treatment and calculation of GUF source of funds / separation from “Direct government funds”  GUF: basic funding from Ministry of Education and Research (and from Ministry of Health and Care services)

Direct government: The Research Council of Norway, funding from counties/municipalities, project funding from ministries

Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  
18.5.5. Weighting and estimation methods
Description of weighting method  Not the case, we perform a census.
Description of the estimation method  Not the case, we perform a census.
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top