Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistisches Bundesamt


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistisches Bundesamt

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Unit H24 - Research, Culture

1.5. Contact mail address

Martin Szibalski

Gustav-Stresemann-Ring 11

D-65180 Wiesbaden

Germany


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 31/10/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 31/10/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 31/10/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on higher education R&D (HERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the higher education sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the higher education sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector.

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics(EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics) complements this with guidelines for further harmonisation among EU, EFTA and candidate countries.

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
We do not use additional classifications  
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  Definition according FM:

Research and experimental development (R & D) comprise creative and systematic work undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge – including knowledge of humankind, culture and society – and to devise new applications of available knowledge.

Use of R&D coefficients.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)

Sports science" is included in "humanities" and "pharmacy" is included in "natural sciences".

Until 2014: Humanities generally include educational sciences, linguistics, psychology.

Since 2014: Engineering and technology generally include computer information science.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  no data available

 

For the Government sector, every fourth year a detailed breakdown is asked

3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Higher education sector No deviation of the FM2015. Included are Universities, technical universities, university hospitals, teacher training colleges, comprehensive institutions of higher education (Gesamthochschulen), colleges of arts and music, specialised colleges with focus on applied sciences (Fachhochschulen).
     Tertiary education institution  Yes, when main focus is academic, not professional.
          University and colleges: core of the sector  Yes
     University hospitals and clinics  Yes, total inclusion
     HE Borderline institutions  Research institutions not administered by the university and independent from university budget (AN-Institute) are not included. They are included in GOV.
Inclusion of units that primary don`t belong to HES  NO
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities Academic personnel which belongs to the administrative staff and administrative personnel of the teaching and research units is included. In the calculation process non-teaching and non-R&D activities of all personnel are eliminated.
External R&D personnel In general all personnel with work contract with HES institutions are included (internal personnel). In addition, in HES post-graduate students receiving funding are included. The data are based on a special survey which includes post-graduate students who are engaged in R&D (in general working on a doctoral or post-doctoral thesis ("Habilitation")) and receive grants. The full amount of grants awarded to the post-graduate students is included in HERD.
Clinical trials  
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from Rest of the world by sector - availability  yes
Payments to Rest of the world by sector - availability  not available
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  Intramural and extramural expenditures are separately surveyed in the questionnaire
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
 Coverage of years  Calendar year
Source of funds

For the higher education sector, the breakdown by sources of funds is only available at total sector level, not at fields-of-science level.
Funds from enterprises:
- In 1997, all in all, DM 300.8 million of the funds from the BE sector originated from industry-linked foundations and similar institutions.
- Since 1983 survey data
- Until 1981, national estimate.
Funds from Government:
- Including

No data on internal/external funds and transfer/exchange funds are collected. Use of R&D coefficients to allocated R&D expenditures, transferability of the information on revenues to expenditures is problematic 

Type of R&D No breakdown as from 1994. Up to 1993 basic research was separately reported. Applied research and experimental development were aggregated. Basic research data were provided from the surveys of the Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology.
Type of costs No breakdown is available for the additional funds from the German Research Association (see details under Source of funds).
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  We have no data available for HES in terms of R&D defence.
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  fixed date
Function Researchers = Academic (and creative arts) personnel = professors, university assistants, other academic personnel, teachers for special tasks and post-graduate students who receive scholarships.
Technicians = Technical or library personnel.
Others = Administrative personnel, workers, service personnel at university clinics, etc.
Qualification University graduates = university and other post-secondary graduates.
Other post secondary = included with university graduates.
Secondary = holders of diplomas of secondary education.
Other = all others.
Age  There are no data available. 
Citizenship  There are no data available. 
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  fixed date
Function  Researchers = Academic (and creative arts) personnel = professors, university assistants, other academic personnel, teachers for special tasks and post-graduate students who receive scholarships.
Technicians = Technical or library personnel.
Others = Administrative personnel, workers, service personnel at university clinics, etc.
Qualification  University graduates = university and other post-secondary graduates.
Other post secondary = included with university graduates.
Secondary = holders of diplomas of secondary education.
Other = all others.
Age  There are no data available. 
Citizenship  There are no data available. 
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

FTE is calculated by taking 100% of personnel working full-time and 50% (main occupation) respectively 20% (second job "nebenberuflich") of personnel working part-time.

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 We do not apply cross-classification for function and qualification    
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit is the institutional unit as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993, if there are deviations please explain.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population of institutional units.

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective, the target population for the national R&D survey of the HES Sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including known R&D performers or assumed to perform R&D). In practise however, countries in their R&D surveys might have difficulty in identifying R&D activities at the municipality level. 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  The target population consists of all institutions of the higher education sector, including university hospitals and all research institutes, centres, experimental stations and clincs that have their R&D activities under the direct control of, or administered by, tertiary institutions. . Borderline institutes located at universities but independent in accounting are included in GOV.  
Estimation of the target population size  approx. 470  

 

3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested. The base year for the unit Purchasing Power Standard (PPS) and PPS per inhabitant at constant prices is currently 2005. All calculations of non-basic unit (national currencies) are done by Eurostat.


4. Unit of measure Top

Questionnaire expenditures: in Euro

Questionnaire: number of persons


5. Reference Period Top

expenditures: calendar year

personnel: point in time (1. Dec.)


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations The obligations arises from European legislation only. There is no national legal framework for this.
 
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  yes
Legal acts Gesetz über die Statistik für das Hochschulwesen (Hochschulstatistikgesetz -HStatG) vom 2. November 1990 (BGBl. I S. 2414), das durch Art. 1 des Gesetzes vom 2. März 2016 (BGBl. I S. 342) novelliert wurde
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  yes
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  yes
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  yes
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  no
Planned changes of legislation  no
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law: Federal Statistics Act (BStatG)

 b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff: Is ensured by oath of office

 

 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

cell suppression, Confidential data/cells are delivered to Eurostat with the relevant remark.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Date of final release of Provisional national data: T+10 month

Date of final release of Final national data: T+16 month

8.2. Release calendar access

no official release calendar for this statistic

8.3. Release policy - user access

Publications/data releases are usually accompanied by a press release (accessible to the public).


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

yearly


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  yes Regular press release in autumn once a year, when the online publication is published
Ad-hoc releases  no  

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination

 

Mean of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y

Homepage:

https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Forschung-Entwicklung/_inhalt.html

Genesis:

https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online?sequenz&language=de&sequenz=tabellen&selectionname=218*#abreadcrumb

Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 N  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

GENESIS online: https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online?sequenz&language=de&sequenz=tabellen&selectionname=218*#abreadcrumb

Database of the ministry for education and research: https://www.datenportal.bmbf.de/portal/de/K1.html

 

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information GOV/PNP/HES: No micro-data access to outside users
Access cost policy  
Micro-data anonymisation rules  
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means

 

Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Yes    The main figures are available in tables and graphs on the internet, detailed online publication available for download, GENESIS database (see above)
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Yes   With rules of privacy; time necessary is calculated for the customers, if the data preparation needs more than half an hour, the customer has to pay a fee
Other  No   Data prepared for regular publications of other authorities, for example state statistical offices and federal and state ministries for education and research (see above)

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Quality report for data collection "personnel HES" ("Qualitätsbericht - Personal an Hochschulen"):

https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Hochschulen/_inhalt.html#sprg410792

 Quality report for data collection "expenditures HES" ("Qualitätsbericht - Hochschulfinanzstatistik"):

https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Hochschulen/_inhalt.html#sprg410792

 Additional Explanations in publication; e.g. calculation R&D coefficients ("Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.3.2): Monetäre hochschulstatistische Kennzahlen):

https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Hochschulen/_inhalt.html#sprg233706

 

 

 

 

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   Quality report, methodological explanations in each publication, methodological articles, when methods are changed.
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  Main feedback of users consists in asking for additional breakdowns or combination of variables. As far as possible the requested data are produced.
Measure to increase clarity  No
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   Good. No mentionable complaints.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Broad Quality Management within the Statistical Offices of Germany and the Federal States (Länder). Rules are described for example in: "Qualitätshandbuch der Statistischen Ämter des Bundes und der Länder":

https://stanet-web.stba.testa-de.net/DE/Statistikuebergreifend/Qualitaetsmanagement/Qualitaetshandbuch.pdf

Quality report for data collection "personnel HES" ("Qualitätsbericht - Personal an Hochschulen"):

https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Hochschulen/_inhalt.html#sprg410792

Quality report for data collection "expenditures HES" ("Qualitätsbericht - Hochschulfinanzstatistik"):

https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Hochschulen/_inhalt.html#sprg410792

Regular review of the implementation of quality guidelines (Qualitätsrichtlinien (QRL))

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The overall assessment of the HES R&D methodology is good especially because of the mandatory character. Some weakness appears while not asking for R&D expenditure and personnel but instead working with R&D coefficients.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level

 

Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1  Eurostat; European Commission  Data tabulation and publication, building EU aggregates; research policy assessment
 1  Ministries of Education and Research  Research policy making and assessment, analysis and publications
1 OECD, UNESCO  Data tabulation, analysis and publication
4  Mainly economists  Analysis, policy assessment

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, Other Ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  No user satisfaction survey has been conducted.
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  not available
Short description of the feedback received  not available
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

As R&D figures are based on mandatory surveys (HES expenditures and personnel) the completeness is nearly 100%

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197. The Regulation (EU) stipulates periodicity of variables that should be provided, breakdowns and if they should be provided mandatory or on voluntary basis.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables x          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure  x          
Optional data on R&D expenditure      x     no legal basis for collecting special indicators
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  x          
Optional data on R&D personnel      x     no legal basis for collecting special indicators
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel  x          

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure

 

  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y-1981          
Type of R&D  N          
Type of costs  Y-1981          
Socioeconomic objective            
Region            
FORD            
Type of institution            

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)

 

  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1995          
Function  Y-1995          
Qualification  N          
Age  N          
Citizenship  N          
Region  Y-1995          
FORD  Y-1995      changes in national classification  2015  adoption to national classification 
Type of institution  N          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)

 

  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1995          
Function Y-1995          
Qualification  Y-1995          
Age  Y-1995          
Citizenship  Y-1995          
Region  Y-1995          
FORD  Y-1995      changes in national classification  2015  adoption to national classification
Type of institution  Y-1995          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
 researchers/university graduates  Y-1995        
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional').

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'

 

  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  not relevant  2  4  1  3    +/-
Total R&D personnel in FTE  not relevant  2  4  1  3    +/-
Researchers in FTE  not relevant  2  4  1  3    +/-

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators

 

Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure    x      
Total R&D personnel in FTE    x      
Researchers in FTE    x      

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys. Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).

Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

no sample

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by source of funds
Source of funds R&D expenditure
Business enterprise  not applicable
Government  not applicable
Higher education  not applicable
Private non-profit  not applicable
Rest of the world  not applicable
Total  not applicable
13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by function and qualification
    R&D personnel (FTE)
Occupation Researchers  n.a.
Technicians  n.a.
Other support staff  n.a.
Qualification ISCED 8  n.a.
ISCED 5-7  n.a.
ISCED 4 and below  n.a.
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

All institutions of the higher education sector, including university hospitals and all research institutes, centres, experimental stations and clincs that have their R&D activities under the direct control of, or administered by, tertiary institutions are included in HES. Borderline institutes located at universities but independent in accounting are included in GOV.

Very good coverage

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

Yearly assessment, official registers

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

n.a.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 Measurement errors can occur while using R&D coefficients.

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

regular recalculation of the R&D coefficients based on current personnel data

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

-Unit non-response which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

-Item non-response which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates. 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfactory by computing the un-weighted response rate.

Definition: Eligible are the survey units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with certain units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’.

Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted unit non-response rate
Number of units with a response in the survey Total number of units in the survey Unit non-response rate (Un-weighted)
 468  468 0 (mandatory survey)
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:

Un-weighted Item Non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
R&D variable/breakdown Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%) Comments
 No information available.  mandatory survey  No information available.
     
     
13.3.3.3. Measures to increase response rate

not relevant

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied  Possible errors are checked by comparing the results with results from previous surveys and calling back the respondent units.
Estimates of data entry errors  Data from institutions are rejected if not correct. The information provider has to deliver new data.
Variables for which coding was performed  See above.
Estimates of coding errors  See above.
Editing process and method  See above.
Procedure used to correct errors  Data from institutions are rejected if not correct. Contact and questions to the institution until correct data is provided.
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:

Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period:

31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data:

submission to Eurostat: 21.10.2022

c) Lag (days): 286

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period:

b) Date of first release of national data:

c) Lag (days):

a) End of reference period:

31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data:

submission to Eurostat: 30.06.2021

c) Lag (days): 545

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  10  18
Delay (days)   0  0
Reasoning for delay  no delays  no delays


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

2016 time use survey to assess the assumptions for R&D coefficient calculation -> adjustment of R&D coefficients

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197  or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts/issues.

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).  NO  internal personnel and graduates (=external)
Researcher FM2015, § 5.35-5.39.  NO  
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, § 5.58-5.61 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  NO  
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, § 5.49-5.57 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  NO  
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25  NO  
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015, Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).  NO  
Statistical unit FM2015 §3.70 (in combination with the  Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  NO  
Target population FM2015 §9.6 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  NO  
Sector coverage FM2015 §3.67-3.69 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  NO   
Post-secondary (non university / college) education institutions FM2015 §9.12 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  NO  
Hospitals and clinics FM2015 §9.13-9.17,  §9.109-9.112 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  NO  
Borderline research institutions FM2015 §9.18-9.27 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  NO  Coherent with FM2015 § 9.24
Major fields of science and technology coverage and breakdown Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 7.3.  Yes

Sports science" is included in "humanities" and "pharmacy" is included in "natural sciences".

Until 2014: Humanities generally include educational sciences, linguistics, psychology.

Since 2014: Engineering and technology generally include computer information science.

Reference period Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 4-6.  NO  
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection method No  Questionaire
Survey questionnaire / data collection form No  Online form
Cooperation with respondents No  Deadline extension is possible
Coverage of external funds No  
Distinction between GUF and other sources – Sector considered as source of funds for GUF Yes No distiction is made, definition in Germany differs ("Grundmittel")
Data processing methods No Administrative data in combination with R&D coefficients
Treatment of non-response No  Imputation
Variance estimation No  Not required due to full survey
Method of deriving R&D coefficients No R&D coefficients on basis of time use survey 2016/2017, recalculation every 2 years on basis of personnel data
Quality of R&D coefficients No  last update R&D coefficients: 2020
Data compilation of final and preliminary data No We compilate final and preliminary data
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series

 

  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)  2016-2021 2016, 1995, 1991 2016: Revised methodology for R&D coefficients on basis of time use survey in 2016/2017 -> increase of R&D coefficients

1995:The method of evaluating R&D resources in the higher education sector changed and was applied retroactively to 1981 to make the 1981 to 1994 data compatible with the more recent data.

1991:graduate students conducting research and receiving grants for that purpose were included for the first time among higher education researchers (close to 10000 FTE). The relevant grants paid to them in 1991 were included in higher education R&D expenditure (HERD), so total grants paid to higher education in 1991 were well above the earlier figures, because only grants paid directly by government had been included up till then; the outcome was an increase in total government funding for R&D performed by higher education in that year. 1995:The method of evaluating R&D resources in the higher education sector changed and was applied retroactively to 1981 to make the 1981 to 1994 data compatible with the more recent data. 

  Function  2016-2021   Breakdown: Researchers, Technicans, other supporting staff.
(According to the employment status or professional position of the higher education institution at which persons are employed.)
  Qualification      Not available (optional)
R&D personnel (FTE)  2016-2021  2016, 2006, 1995, 1991 2016: Revised methodology for R&D coefficients on basis of time use survey in 2016/2017 -> increase of R&D coefficients.

2006: Modification of the calculation method for R&D personnel (FTE).

1995:The method of evaluating R&D resources in the higher education sector changed and was applied retroactively to 1981 to make the 1981 to 1994 data compatible with the more recent data.

1991:graduate students conducting research and receiving grants for that purpose were included for the first time among higher education researchers (close to 10000 FTE). The relevant grants paid to them in 1991 were included in higher education R&D expenditure (HERD), so total grants paid to higher education in 1991 were well above the earlier figures, because only grants paid directly by government had been included up till then; the outcome was an increase in total government funding for R&D performed by higher education in that year. 1995:The method of evaluating R&D resources in the higher education sector changed and was applied retroactively to 1981 to make the 1981 to 1994 data compatible with the more recent data.
  Function   2016-2021   Breakdown: Researchers, Technicans, other supporting staff.
(According to the employment status or professional position of the higher education institution at which persons are employed.)
  Qualification      Not available (optional)
R&D expenditure  2016-2021 2016, 1995, 1991 2016: Revised methodology for R&D coefficients on basis of time use survey in 2016/2017 -> increase of R&D coefficients.

1995:The method of evaluating R&D resources in the higher education sector changed and was applied retroactively to 1981 to make the 1981 to 1994 data compatible with the more recent data.

1991:graduate students conducting research and receiving grants for that purpose were included for the first time among higher education researchers (close to 10000 FTE). The relevant grants paid to them in 1991 were included in higher education R&D expenditure (HERD), so total grants paid to higher education in 1991 were well above the earlier figures, because only grants paid directly by government had been included up till then; the outcome was an increase in total government funding for R&D performed by higher education in that year. 1995:The method of evaluating R&D resources in the higher education sector changed and was applied retroactively to 1981 to make the 1981 to 1994 data compatible with the more recent data.
Source of funds 1995-2021   Downwards adjustment of government funding to higher education.
Type of costs 1995-2021   Breakdown: Current Costs (Labour Costs, other current costs), Capital Expenditures.
Type of R&D 1995-2021   Breakdown: Basic research, Applied research, Experimental development for reference year 2016 only. Not available as a time series. (Optional for Higher Education Sector.)
Other      

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Are the data produced in the same way in the odd and even years? If no, please explain the main differences.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics. The education statistics (UNESCO/OECD/Eurostat (UOE)) include R&D expenditure in tertiary educational institutions and follow the recommendations of the Frascati manual regarding the definition of R&D expenditure. Due to the differences in the coverage some differences in the two datasets (UOE questionnaire and the R&D HES surveys) are expected. However, there is a need to ensure that a harmonised approach is used for compiling data in the two domains. The two statistical domains should aim for a consistent use of R&D coefficients for splitting teaching and research time.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

No HES sector in National accounts.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
           
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
 unknown  unknown  unknown  unknown  unknown  unknown
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Education statistics

No information

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

 

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure – HERD (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10) 20612814 155600 120500
Final data (delivered T+18) 20661351 156543 120901
Difference (of final data) 48537 943 401
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure

 

  Average remuneration (cost¨in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  FTE: 156543; Labour Costs (in Mill.): 12461243 (in Thousand)
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  We have no information on the costs of external R&D personel in HES

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary

 

  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  not known  There are no sub-contracted
Data collection costs  not known  There are no sub-contracted
Other costs  not known  There are no sub-contracted
Total costs  not known  There are no sub-contracted
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached

 

  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  not known  not known
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  not known  not known
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  not known  not known
Total cost  not known  not known

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  Hochschulpersonal- und Hochschulfinanzstatistik
Type of survey  Administrative statistics (Hochschupersonal- und Hochschulfinanzstatistik)
Combination of sample survey and census data  
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  
Variables the survey contributes to Total expenditure and personnel. R&D coefficients were used (last update: 2020). Data on postgraduate students receiving funding and on scholarships and fellowships for postgraduates are collected seperately by the Federal Statistical Office.
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  last survey 2022 (personnel data 2022, expenditure data 2021)
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  no sample survey    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)      
Stratification variable classes      
Population size      
Planned sample size      
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)      
Survey frame      
Sample design      
Sample size      
Survey frame quality      
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source Hochschulpersonal- und Hochschulfinanzstatistik, decentral statistics via Statistical Offices of the Länder
Description of collected data / statistics  HES personnel and expenditures, R&D coefficients were seperately calculated and updated regularly (see Quality report)
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to 2021 (No deviation)
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Information provider  Microdata of every institution is requested
Description of collected information  All mandatory variables are collected.
Data collection method  The administrative and questioned data is collected online by statistical offices of the federal states.The questionnaire is improved regularly. The federal states deliver their collected data to the federal statistical office.
Time-use surveys for the calculation of R&D coefficients  last survey: 2016
Realised sample size (per stratum)  
Mode of data collection (face-to-face interviews; telephone interviews; postal surveys, etc.)  online
Incentives used for increasing response  no incentives, mandatory survey
Follow-up of non-respondents  
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility) see 13.3.3 
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)  
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
FAnnex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:

Expenditures:

https://erhebungsportal.estatistik.de/Erhebungsportal/#5ykehb5nWadX6tcS/unterstuetzte-statistiken/bildung/hochschulen/hochschulfinanzen-jaehrlich

Personal:

https://erhebungsportal.estatistik.de/Erhebungsportal/#23FBERoTXsStkNMP/unterstuetzte-statistiken/bildung/hochschulen/hochschulpersonal

Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  
18.4. Data validation

data validation processes via federal states (Länder) at micro level

data validation processes at federal statistical office at macro level (e.g. comparing pervious years)

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Generally no imputations necessary (mandatory variables).

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)   There is no estimation
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  Data is estimated on the basis of previous cycles.
18.5.3. Methodology for derivation of R&D coefficients
National methodology for their derivation. The coefficients are based on a empirical and normative design. It includes data and assumptions about the activities of personnel in the Higher education sector. Since repoting year 1995 the Federal Statistical Office distinguishes between "research funded by basic resources" and "research funded by external resources" in regard to R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. External funds and personnel financed by external funds are entirely classified as R&D. R&D expenditures and R&D personnel funded by basic resources are estimated by appling R&D coefficients.

The R&D coefficients and the basic assumptions of the method for deriving the coefficients have been reviewed in years 2016 and 2017.

There are different R&D coefficients and methods for the different types of universities and collegues within the higher education sector.

Universities, collegues of education and collegues of theology: Form reporting year 2016, the R&D coefficients are subjected directly to time use for R&D. The Federal Statistical Office surveyed the scientific staff for its time use for R&D in the winter semester 2016/2017. The survey was voluntary and the data were wighted by the official figures of personnel in HES to ensure representativeness.

R&D coefficients for universities are adjusted regularly on basis of Personnel Statistcs of Higher Education Sector.
Revision policy for the coefficients  The coefficients are revised every two years with the updated structure of scientific personnel.
Issues that affect their quality (e.g. date of last update, aggregation level at which they are computed, etc).  The last update of the coefficients was for the reported year 2018.The aggregation level for other higher education institutions than university is very general. This could affect the quality of the data.
18.5.4. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data

Information of local units from student statistics (Studierendenstatistik) were used to deviate expenditures

Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items R&D coefficients are used. The coefficients are based on a empirical and normative design. It includes data and assumptions about the activities of personnel in the Higher education sector. Since repoting year 1995 the Federal Statistical Office distinguishes between "research funded by basic resources" and "research funded by external resources" in regard to R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. External funds and personnel financed by external funds are entirely classified as R&D. R&D expenditures and R&D prsonnel funded by basic resources are estimated by appling R&D coefficients. The R&D coefficients and the basic assumptions of the method for deriving the coefficients have been reviewed in years 2016 and 2017. There are different R&D coefficients and methods for the different types of universities and collegues within the higher education sector. Universities, collegues of education and collegues of theology: Form reporting year 2016, the R&D coefficients are subjected directly to time use for R&D. The Federal Statistical Office surveyed the scientific staff for its time use for R&D in the winter semester 2016/2017. The survey was voluntary and the data were wighted by the official figures of personnel in HES to ensure representativeness. R&D coefficients for universities are adjusted regularly on basis of Personnel Statistcs of Higher Education Sector.
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  VAT excl.
Treatment and calculation of GUF source of funds / separation from “Direct government funds”   not possible
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  see above
18.5.5. Weighting and estimation methods
Description of weighting method  no weighting
Description of the estimation method  nonprobabilistic methods: secondary data, previous year, industry averages
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top