Structure of earnings survey 2010 (earn_ses2010)

National Reference Metadata in ESS Standard for Quality Reports Structure (ESQRS)

Compiling agency: Czech Statistical Office


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Statistical presentation
3. Statistical processing
4. Quality management
5. Relevance
6. Accuracy and reliability
7. Timeliness and punctuality
8. Coherence and comparability
9. Accessibility and clarity
10. Cost and Burden
11. Confidentiality
12. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Czech Statistical Office

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Labour Market and Equal Opportunities Statistic Department

1.5. Contact mail address

Na padesatem 81
100 82 Praha 10
Czech Republic


2. Statistical presentation Top
2.1. Data description

The composition of the 2010 Structure of Earnings Survey (SES) Quality Report is based on the EC Regulation No. 698/2006 of May 2006. The quality of the statistical data as well as the whole course of the survey is assessed according to criteria relevant for users, processors and administrators of the survey (relevance, accuracy, punctuality and timeliness, accessibility and clarity, comparability and coherence).

The main statistical source for the SES data has been the ”Informacni system o prumernem vydelku“ (ISPV, i.e. Information System on the Average Earnings). The course and development of the survey is directed by the Commission on the direction and coordination of works on the ISPV, which is composed by representatives of the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, the Czech Statistical Office, the Czech National Bank, CERGE-Economic Institute, High School of Economics in Prague, Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions, Union of Industry and Transportation. The main goal of ISPV is to show earnings levels broken down by individual occupations, other results include estimations on the earnings parameters of the population of employees in the Czech Republic.

The ISPV consists of two basic parts – surveys of business and non-business spheres of the national economy of the Czech Republic. The business sphere is composed of  economical subjects (ES) – enterprises which remunerate their employees with wage according to the section 109, paragraph 2, of the Act No 262/2006 Coll.; the non-business sphere is composed of economic subjects (ES) which remunerate their employees with salary according to the section 109, paragraph 3, of the same Act.

The ISPV in the business sphere has been taking place as a quarterly survey in enterprises with 10 or more employees (ISPV-MZS). With quarterly periodicity, basic data on wage sums and working time and numbers of employees. Half-yearly, the detailed databases are gathered: wage components, hourly earnings and working hours of individual employees. Since 2010, the ISPV covers also non-profit organizations and the small entrepreneurs from the SNA sector of Household. In addition, an 2011 ad-hoc survey for ES with less than 10 employees was made for 2010 reference year (micro-subjects).

In the non-business spheres, the source of data has been Information System on Salary (ISP), which covers all ESs of the sphere, i.e. exhaustive survey. ISP is half yearly.

Based on the data from both ISPV-MZS and ISP, the Structure of Earnings Survey is annual survey in the Czech Republic. The following scheme shows the system of earnings surveys for 2010:

 

System of structural earnings surveys in the CR

2.2. Classification system

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.3. Coverage - sector

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.5. Statistical unit

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.6. Statistical population

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.7. Reference area

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.8. Coverage - Time

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.9. Base period

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.


3. Statistical processing Top
3.1. Source data

The 2010 SES stem from three sources: the survey of the business sphere (ISPV-MZS), the survey of the non-business sphere (ISP) and the survey of micro-subjects of business sphere. The data base had been cut before computation with regard to some industries to meet Eurostat requirements (the national SES covers also NACE A). The following description regards the data adapted in this way.

 

The survey of business sphere

ISPV-MZS is a regular quarterly sample statistical survey. The sample of employees can be characterised as a two-stage probability sampling without repetition. In the first stage, enterprises are found using stratification sampling, all employees inside these enterprises are sampled in the second stage. Population frame for the first stage of the sampling is made using the Business Register of the CZSO and the RARIS register which allows to decide whether the enterprise belongs to business or non-business sphere. The population is created by active enterprises with 10 or more employees; it is stratified by:

  • Industry
  • Size group
  • Region.

Industrial strata are set according to the similarity in the labour nature and structure of occupations and average wages similarity according to the Wage Enterprise Reporting. The population is divided to 6 groups:

  • agriculture, forestry and fishing
  • industry and transportation
  • construction
  • trade
  • market services
  • other services

Within these groups more detailed strata are defined based on similarity in wage levels and occupational structures.
There are four strata based on the size group of the ES: 10-49; 50-249; 250-999; 1000+. The NUTS 3 region is defined by Constitution Act no 347/1997,Coll.

 

The 2010 frame population incorporated 39,212 enterprises, 3,451 of them have sent data worth of processing. The following table show a summary on the cumulated sample stratification with the numbers of enterprises in the population and the probability of the sampling.

 

Frame population of the ISPV-MZS and the sampling rates 

Branch Size group
10-49 50-249 250-999 1000 +
Non financial enterprises

26,416 6,241 1,172 197
4.5 % 15.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Financial nstitutions
i
0 [1] 90 20 9
0.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Governmental institutions 21 71 24 15
4.5 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Entrepreneurs in Households sector 3,874 128 2 0
4.5 % 15.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Non-profit institutions

824 100 8 0
1.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %

 

The specific rate of enterprises defined in advance in the individual cells of the sampling scheme is selected from the frame population. The big enterprises with 250 or more employees are selected with probability equal 1, it means exhaustively; in stratum 10-249, the enterprise are selected by means of systematic random sampling method with non-equal probabilities. The sampling rate for stratum 50-249 was 15% and for stratum 10-49 it was 4.5 %. This part of the sample file is updated by the method of “rotating panel” with a period of nine years, i.e. all enterprises 10-249 employees will be replaced after 9 years.

 

The survey of the non-business sphere

ISP is a regular half-yearly exhaustive statistical survey. ESs bound to respond by law have been sending the information on all their employees. Consequently, there are no sampling errors in the non-business sphere, only non-sampling ones. The frame population for the 2010 incorporated 16,960 ESs from which 13,451 send data worth of processing.

 

The survey of micro-subjects

An Ad hoc survey on the business sphere enterprises with less than ten employees was carried out in 2011. The sample of employees can be characterised as a two-stage probability sampling without revolving. In the first stage, enterprises are found using stratification sampling, while all employees inside these enterprises are sampled in the second stage. The frame population was stratified by:

  • Size class
  • Industrial groupings

Two size classes have been used for the stratification, see following table. There have also been ten industrial groupings, similarly as in the ISPV-MZS.

The frame population for the 2010 incorporated 187,407 ESs from which 1,139 ESs send data worth of processing. The following table show a summary on the cumulative sampling strata with the numbers of ESs in the frame population and sampling rates:

 

The frame population and sampling rates

Size class
1-5 6-9
155,761 31,646
1.2% 2.9%

 


 

[1] Financial institutions with 10-49 employees are sampled within group of non-financial enterprises.

3.2. Frequency of data collection

ISPV (business sphere) quarterly; ISP (non-business sphere) half-yearly; micro-subjects 4-yearly by EU-SES.

3.3. Data collection

The data of ISPV-MZS are collected from respondents in the form of databases; they include information on employer and employees. In more than 90 % cases, data stem directly from inter-enterprise information system on wages and personal information. About nine out of ten respondents use electronic mail for sending data, the rest use diskettes, rarely paper form.

3.4. Data validation

For data checking and entering respectively, there was “Local Acquisition Software ISPV 2009”, which needed to be installed to local hard disk. The other way is use of Internet Checking Program, through which data could be sent. In contrast with the Local Acquisition Software, the data could not be edited in this way. Both programs are available on the website www.ispv.cz for free, see section “Pro respondenty šetření”. There is direct communication with the respondent via phone or e-mail. It could serve for revision of mistakes.

3.5. Data compilation

see chapter 2.

3.6. Adjustment

No methods used to estimated/model the missing information have been created. Survey sapmles are supposed to represent the whole national economy.


4. Quality management Top
4.1. Quality assurance

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

4.2. Quality management - assessment

The quality of the SES depends on the external provider contracted by MLSA.


5. Relevance Top
5.1. Relevance - User Needs

Relevance denotes the degree to which statistics meet users’ needs. International survey of 2010 SES cannot be judged separately, the results of the national SES are predominantly used in the CR annually, and also results of the ISPV. Therefore, this part refers mainly line to relevance of these surveys and their results for the domestic users.

 

The users of the structural earnings surveys results

 

Central government, trade unions and organizations of employers:

Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, Labour Offices, Ministry of Finance, Czech Statistical Office, Czech National Bank, Czech-Moravian Confederation of Trade Unions, Confederation of Industry of the Czech republic. Their requirements and comments are formulated and assessed during meetings of the directing Commission.

 

Research institutions and universities

CERGE-EI, University of Economics, VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Aarhus School of Business. Their requirements on the width and quality of the data are formulated during joint research projects with the processing organization.

 

Labour Offices and Courts

Labour Offices are important users of both national ISPV and ISPV regional results. The Courts  lords use the ISPV when solving some problems on labour laws.

 

Respondents

Respondents of the survey have possibility to get a free hard-copy of the publication of the ISPV-MZS results. The contact with them strengthens a feedback with processing organization, their comments help expose drawback of the survey and consequently remove them.

 

Public

The public has free electronic access to national survey results, the web pages are placed on MLSA (www.mpsv.cz or portal.mpsv.cz), or directly on the ISPV portal www.ispv.cz, yearly results are also available at the CZSO domain www.czso.cz.

 

 

5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Satisfaction of the users have been formulated and assessed during the sessions of the directing Commission. In addition, results of the satisfaction questionnaires are periodically evaluated. Answers predominantly refer to national variables and saturation of domestic needs.

5.3. Completeness

There is perfect complience with the Regulation on SES.

5.3.1. Data completeness - rate

100%


6. Accuracy and reliability Top

-

6.1. Accuracy - overall

Generally, accuracy denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values of the variables under consideration. The differences between estimations and true values are called errors, errors caused by the sampling are sampling errors and other errors are called non-sampling errors.

 

6.2. Sampling error

 The calculation of sampling errors

The sampling error is expressed as a coefficient of variation of the mean. The CV is a division of the standard deviation of the mean (numerator) and the mean (denominator). The standard deviation have been calculated by means of common parametric method. The weighted data have been defined for the calculation adequately as a one-stage stratified probability sample of groups with limited number of elements in every stage with equal probabilities.
In contrast with the 2006 SES, the situation of CVs calculation has improved from the following reasons:

  • There are no ESs in the sample selected by quota sampling method
  • ESs in the 250+ stratum have been covered exhaustively
  • Also, all ESs from the non-business sphere and all financial institution with 50+ employees have been covered exhaustively.
  • Recently, coverage has been spread onto non-profit institutions and entrepreneurs in the Households SNA sector.
6.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

A summary on the CVs is attached in the document Coefficients of variation. More detailed information on CVs, standard deviations, means and degrees of freedom etc. is in the attached document Sampling errors.



Annexes:
Coefficients of variation
Sampling errors
6.3. Non-sampling error

In contrast with 2006 SES, the employees of non-profit institutions and of entrepreneurs in the Households SNA sector (so called unincorporated natural persons) have been included to the calculation. The difference between target population required by EC Regulation 698/2006 and the reference population referring to the ESs from the CZSO Business register in 2010 has the solely reason in excluding employees with non-standard labour contracts (temporary jobs).

There is no assessment of the under-coverage and over-coverage as there is no recent quality report on the Business Register available; there are some problems with the units size.

6.3.1. Coverage error

The dominant source of SES is the ISPV which is permanent survey and its sample file is defined and altering gradually. Because of this fact, some under-coverage errors occur due to the situation when the sampling plan for a specific part of the sampling file is created before the grossing-up plan. An assessment of these errors for individual sources is as follows:

 

Coverage errors in the ISPV-MZS

Sampling of ISPV-MZS goes in two stages – updating of the exhaustive part (every year) and progressive changes of sample part by the method of rotating panel. In addition, we must take into account the time needed for the creation of the sampling plan (approx. 2 months) and the time needed for incorporating the new ES into the survey (average time is approx. 6 months). As the survey is carried out just one month after the end of reference period for practical reasons, the new ESs cannot be incorporated at once to the sampling plan.

The following table shows coverage errors that happened because of the sampling plan a technical obstacles, by size classes:

 

Coverage errors of ISPV-MZS 

Coverage errors

Size class

Total

10-49

50-249

250-999

1 000 +

ESs covered

36,133

28,304

6,412

1,196

221

ESs covered [%]

92.1%

90.9%

96.7%

97.6%

100.0%

Under-coverage

 3,079

 2,831

 218

30

0

Under-coverage [%]

7.9%

9.1%

 3.3%

2.4%

0.0%

of which:

 

 

 

 

 

- born after sampling

120

113

7

 0

0

- under threshold of 10 employees

459

455

4

 0

0

- out of sampling plan

 43

43

0

 0

0

- ESs under recruitment

61

2

  34

25

 0

- sampling frame did not catch them

 13

12

1

0

0

- size unknown

141

131

10

0

0

- sampling with probability 0

997

924

 71

2

0

- sampling in year 2011

    83

    73

  10

0

0

- sampling in year 2012

    410

    368

  41

1

0

- sampling not yet done

    752

    710

40

2

0

Frame population – total

39,212

31,135

6,630

1,226

221

 

There has been an alteration in the sampling scheme between 2006 and 2010, the reasons for this were i) implementation of the new version of the NACE classification; ii) harmonization with the CZSO Wage Enterprise Reporting (see chapter Coherence). The coverage error has decreased consequently.

 

Coverage errors in the ISP

The coverage errors have been eliminated by the system of data collection. The “submissioners” have been sending data for themselves as well as for the organizations under their direction (respondents). The submissioners are ministries, regional governments, state funds etc. They have to make a registration to enter the ISP.

The purpose of the registration is to get information on the recent valid contact data, especially the electronic address. In the new campaign, only those submissioners make a registration whose contact data have changed. The respondents do not make a registration, their data are entered by the submissioner.

 

Coverage errors in the micro-subject survey

2010 micro-subject survey had been carried out since September 2011. Because of the sufficient delay and the being ad-hoc, we suppose that the coverage errors in this survey did not happen.

6.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

not appplicable

6.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not appplicable.

6.3.2. Measurement error

In the ISP, data are send via secured internet page of the Ministry of Finance, where basic check mechanisms are embedded. The data gathered this way are then send to the processor. More difficult communication is in the ISP, because the data are send through a submissioner. On the other hand, this system minimizes coverage errors. All the data are send electronically.

In the survey on micro-subjects, data were send electronically in 39 % cases and almost 61 % of respondents send data on paper questionnaires. The risk of wrong data was the biggest there. Revision was made by the processing firm during phone consultation with the respondent.

All the data files (ISPV-MZS, ISP and micro-subjects) have been preserved in the seven data-stores. In the individual data-stores, there are saved original data from the respondents, data before the data-checks and data after the data-checks (both automatic and manual). Grossing-up to the whole population is made by applying weights for individual records on the final database file.

Triple automatic check is made during the data collecting and processing. In addition, a visual check is made after that. Any mistakes found are dealt with in relation to their importance – either by contacting the respondent or directly by the processing company. Some help is obvious with coding of occupational classification since this task is the most difficult for the respondent; consultations by telephone are provided. After data entering, additional checks are made on the levels of regions and individual professions. Some checks are also made accordingly on the level of ESs. On the aggregated level, we search for changes in time and look for explanations. An example can be earnings level in the individual occupation in region – in case on change more than 20 % y-o-y the enterprise data are analysed.

The very last stage is data check before their sending to Eurostat. 1,979,412 records passed all the checks, 37,922 have been erased. The most records erased didn’t pass the check on the number of weeks to which the yearly earnings refers - 12,399; 7,607 records failed in the check on the number of paid hours in month.

6.3.3. Non response error

In this part of the chapter, reasons for non-response of whole enterprises are described together with procedures for minimising the errors.

6.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Response rate in the ISPV-MZS

Non-response rate in 2010 was 16.2 %. The comparison with 2002 and 2006 SES is difficult due to different circumstances of the surveys – here was dominant part of quota sample in 2002 and also in 2006 the quota part sample was still 10 %. There was no quota sample in 2010. Moreover, there were non-profit institutions and entrepreneurs in the Households SNA sector included in the 2010 sample.

 

Response rate in the ISPV-MZS

Sample file -
response category (ES)
Size class
Total 10-49 50-249 250-999 1 000+
Data processed 3,451 924

1,178

1,131 218
Data not processed 666 350 248 65 3
Of which:          
- recruitment 84 36 44 3 1
- wrong data 75 19 34 21 1
- data not sent 42 25 11 6 0
- direct refusal 21 13 6 2 0
- indirect refusal 23 17 4 2 0
- no reaction 119 64 37 17 1
- technical reasons 203 106 86 11 0
- temporarily off employees 75 60 13 2 0
- other reasons 24 10 13 1 0
Non-response rate 16.2% 27.5% 17.4% 5.4% 1.4%

 

Response rate in the ISP

It is important to know the exact frame population of the survey, which comes to existence during the registration and data collecting itself (see 6.3.1 Coverage errors).

 

Response rate in the ISP

Sample file -
response category (ES)
Size class
Total 10-49 50-249 250-999 1 000+
Data processed 13,451 5,289 1,986 214 66
Data not processed 3,509 2,991 80 5 0
Of which:          
- wrong data 787 735 1 0 0
- data not sent 2,722 2,256 79 5 0
Non-response rate 20.7% 36.1% 3.9% 2.2% 0.0%

 

Response rate in the micro-subject survey

Response rates in this ad hoc survey shows following table:

 

Response category (ES)  
Data processed 1,139
Data not processed 1,303
Of which:  
- refusal 3
- no response 395
- address not found 115
- no withdrawal 197
- no employees or dead 89
- after deadline 12
- wrong data 492
Non-response rate 53.4%

 

6.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not used.

6.3.4. Processing error

see below

6.3.4.1. Imputation - rate

Item imputation rate

Items from Table A marked as A12, A13 were added from administrative sources.
As for item A15 – type of collective pay agreement and A14 – the information was sent by respondent and then matched and improved with administrative source information on collective agreements (report of MLSA) and from the Information system on working conditions together with Business Register. If the true value was unknown, we supposed that no collective pay agreement existed (“unknown” is not possible in 2010 SES). 13,258 items have been imputed this way, predominantly from the non-business sphere, because ISP does not cover collective bargaining.
The following table shows numbers of imputed values and rates of imputation for items of Table B.

 

Rates of item imputation in the employees variables

Item

Number of imputed values

Rate of  imputation [%]

B25 – education

36,916

1.9

B26 – tenure

1,545

0.1

B28 – type of contract

808

0.0

Total - imputed

39,228

2.0

 

B25 item was imputed by probability according to the occupation and age; B26 was supposed as “0” if value was not sent; and “ unlimited” value was imputed for the B28 item if wrong code. There was no need to impute other variables.

There was a specific situation as for B23 item. This item has been collected as a older version of ISCO-88 classification for the 2010 data (except the 2011 micro-subject survey). Consequently, they were moved to ISCO-08 classification using transition keys and also with help of data for half-year and whole year of 2011, which were already collected in ISCO-08. So, the data on the same employees could be matched - that proved useful. It means that for B23 item we cannot strictly speak about imputation.

As the extent of the imputations was very small, it has only marginal effect on the accuracy of estimations.

 

Overall imputation rate

Overall number of imputed variables and overall rate of imputation is lower than the sum of individual cases, because in some cases more than one imputation was made for one employee/record. The overall imputation rate is 2.0%.

6.3.5. Model assumption error

Enterprise grossing up and imputations

The aim of the enterprise grossing up is to add weight coefficients to the enterprises from sample in a way to get to results of the same structure and of the same number of enterprises as the frame population had. The weights stem from probability sample weights of individual enterprises, they take account of non-response and sample respondents´ errors as well as recent structure of the frame population.

As for the sector of non-financial enterprises and financial institutions with at least 10 employees (more that 60 % of employees population), the ESs are divided to strata using size class (10-49, 50-249) and NACE groupings and regional breakdown (Prague/rest of country). For each part of this three-dimensional stratum, the proper representation weight is calculated. Every enterprise has – by stratum and sample probability – primarily set a maximum weight (weight limit). In case that the representation in the three-dimensional stratum is too small, i.e. actual respondents cannot represent all existing ESs in this stratum, a second step of the weighting is necessary, in which the ESs from same size or regional or NACE groupings are used for additional “tuning”. As for 250-999 size class, only grossing up of the non-response is needed as these enterprises should be covered exhaustively.

As for entrepreneurs with at least of 10 employees, a simplified one-stage grossing up is used; size class is not taken into account for stratification (special stratum is only for ESs with 250+ employees).

Data on non-financial enterprises and financial institutions and entrepreneurs with less that  10 employees (micro-subjects) are collected once a 4 years. Enterprises´ weights are calculated upon the frame population which is up-to-date in the time of the survey. For following years, earnings data are modelled - indexed according to average earnings growth in these small businesses (based on CZSO Enterprise Wages Reporting). Proper extent and structure of the estimation is done by post-stratification and grossing up to recent results of CZSO.

Non-profit organizations are collected exhaustively when they have at least 65 employees; smaller organizations are surveyed on a sample basis once a 4 years together with micro-subjects. Grossing up is similar to micro-subjects.

Non-business sphere is surveyed exhaustively, only grossing up of the non-response is needed there.

A method of historical imputation is used for total non-response in enterprises with 1000+ employees. It means that earnings data from the past of the same ES are modified using wage index of the group of similar enterprises.

 

Post-stratification by NACE

Final step of the data harmonization is a post-stratification and grossing up to results of the CZSO Enterprise Wages Reporting. The CZSO Department of Statistical Processing have been sending data on wages and numbers of employees which had been gathered during a series of CZSO Enterprise Reporting. The Reporting is done on a sample larger to a great extent than ISPV and the results variation on an aggregated level is much lower. The post-stratification is done in two steps.

In the first step, the sample is (post-)stratified by spheres (business and non-business), by 6 basic sectors (5 sectors in business and 1 in non-business sphere), size class (0-9, 10-49, 50-249, 250-999 and 1000+) and by NACE sections (21).

Resulting cross-stratification is collapsed to strata in which each one consists of representative sample of ESs (at least 10 respondent in optimum). On these strata – using enterprise weights – numbers of employees (in FTE) are calculated; those are grossed up to data from mirror strata of the frame population using weight coefficients. The very same numbers of employees are finally situated both in sample and frame population after application of enterprise and post-stratification weights.

In the second step, the sample file is already (post)stratified by sphere (2) and NACE section (21), the earnings volumes are recalculated within cross-stratification using correction coefficients (based on the sample file using enterprise and post-stratification weights) resulting in the mirror earnings aggregates of the frame population.

6.4. Seasonal adjustment

The data are not seasonally adjusted.

6.5. Data revision - policy

The data are not revised.

6.6. Data revision - practice

The data are not revised.

6.6.1. Data revision - average size

The data are not revised.


7. Timeliness and punctuality Top
7.1. Timeliness

The results of the Structure of Earnings Survey have been processed and published at the national level separately for individual surveys: ISPV-MZS, ISP and micro-subjects survey. National SES have been created upon joint database of ISPV-MZS and ISP. The most important time limits are summarized in the following table:

 

Time limits 

Terms

ISPV-MZS

ISP

Micro-subjects

Term for sending data

25.1.2011

11.2.2011

30.9.2011

Deadline for data delivery

23.2.2011

14.2.2011

31.12.2011

Preliminary results

10.3.2011

10.3.2011

4.4.2012

Definitive results

14.3.2011

14.3.2011

not published

SES National version

June 2011

-

7.1.1. Time lag - first result

The data were sent in June 2012.

7.1.2. Time lag - final result

The data were sent in June 2012.

7.2. Punctuality

Based on the comments from the directing Commission, the ISPV quarterly results have been published. They are available for public with 2 and half months delay after the end of reference period.
As for the annual national SES, the tables have been available since the end of June 2011, i.e. 6 months delay after the end of reference year.

The results of micro-subjects survey have been made available together with an analysis of the influence on the overall earnings levels since the directing Commission meeting in April 2012.
The EU SES data have been send to Eurostat in June 2012, i.e. the deadline has been met.

7.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

The results were published by Eurostat.


8. Coherence and comparability Top
8.1. Comparability - geographical

There is one specific detail in the Czech SES – different concept of representative month. There is no calendar month earnings under survey in the CR, but so called average month. The representative month earnings is calculated as:

(Annual Earnings – Irregular Bonuses) / Number of paid month of the employee

The reasons for this procedure is as follows:

  • Eurostat requirement is to exclude the influence of irregular bonuses to the monthly earnings
  • ISPV collects quarterly data on earnings of employees cumulatively from the beginning of the year to the end of respective quarter. Earnings for the “ideal” month calculated using whole year figures are more precise than any calendar month and are quite comparable with results of other EU countries.
  • The whole year earnings (without irregular bonuses) is divided by number of paid months, it means only the time, when the employee had the earnings. By that, gross earnings are not distorted by any unpaid absence, especially illness.

Considering the comparability among EU countries, we must take into account the fact, that our average month has 21.08 working days (whole year presence without unpaid absences), while October 2010 had 20 working days in the Czech Republic.

 

Other differences of the CZ-SES concept from EU concept:

  • Hourly earnings is calculated in analogical way from the monthly earnings as we gather numbers on the hours worked as well as hours paid together with hours of absences.
  • Only employees with standard employment contract are covered, excluded are workers with temporary work contract, students and apprentices.
  • There is no identification of persons; thus, there is no way how to identify whether one employee has only one employment contract with his/her employer or more. One employment contract is one record in the database. In addition, other jobs of the employee in other ES cannot be identified, but whether part-time or full-time, so number of employees with part-time contract in their main job cannot be calculated. Only the share of part-time contracts in all jobs can be assessed.
  • Not only employees with earnings for the specific representative month are included in the database, but all employees with one paid month at minimum whenever during the year. This could be taken into account for the calculation of results on the representative month or hourly earnings. Number of paid weeks should be seen (item B31).
  • All variable on earnings are collected in the national currency Koruna ceska (CZK), respectively in the units derived from it (CZK/hour; CZK/month; CZK/year).
8.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not calculated

8.2. Comparability - over time

The time comparability of 2010, 2006 and 2002 SES are effected by following changes:

  • changes of the definition of reference population
  • changes of the grossing up and weighting methodology

 

Changes of the definition of reference population

  • Reference population has been extended to include the employees of ESs with less than 10 employees. The two ad-hoc surveys of micro-subjects has been carried out in the business sphere in 2007 and 2011. As for 2011, the micro-subject survey covered also the ESs in the sectors of Households and Non-profit organization.
  • Employees of non-profit organizations as well as of the entrepreneurs of the Households sector have been included in 2010 SES.

 

Changes of the grossing up and weighting methodology

  • In contrast with 2006 and 2002, there is grossing up to the entire employees population made in the 2010 SES.
  • Weights for the grossing up are harmonized with CZSO Enterprise Reporting.
8.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not applicable.

8.3. Coherence - cross domain

Coherence of statistics is the extent to which they can be reliably combined in different ways and for various uses. It is, however, generally easier to identify cases of incoherence than to prove coherence.

Coherence should explain similarities and/or differences between SES and other earnings surveys. In the Czech Republic, it means ISPV and statistics based on enterprise report or SES and LFS.

 

Coherence with the Labour Force Survey

The most important methodological inconsistency between ISPV and LFS is the different population coverage. ISPV does not cover self-employed persons. On the other hand, LFS covers only individual households not collective ones (hostels etc.). LFS does not distinguish the sizes of enterprises, it covers whole national economy.

Different methods for coding of industrial and occupational classifications (NACE and ISCO) are other source of inconsistency. In ISPV, NACE codes are gathered straight from the Business Register. The ISCO codes for employees are taken from enterprise´s personal system. In LFS, both the NACE and ISCO codes are coded in the field subjectively by respondent’s or interviewer’s opinion.

 

Coherence with Enterprise Report

There were great changes between 2006 and 2010 both in ISPV and the Enterprise Report. Both surveys had widened their target population by all ESs with 1+ employees - now they have had the same coverage. Their harmonization is under way.

In the final step of the harmonization of ISPV, the grossing up both to the earnings volume and the number of employees from the Enterprise Reporting is made. The Enterprise Reporting brings more precise data on the overall earnings volumes and numbers of employees because of much wider extent of collaborating enterprises. ISPV aims on the detailed structures. The harmonization enables to match the information, to add a view on distribution to the totals etc.

For more on the harmonization, see article: Kateřina Duspivová, Libor Malenovský: Harmonisation of the Average Earnings Information System (MoLSA) with the Wage Statistics (CZSO).In Statistika – Statistics and Economy Journal No. 2/2012 page 76-89



Annexes:
Harmonisation of the Average Earnings Information System (MoLSA) with the Wage Statistic (CZSO)
8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable.

8.5. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

8.6. Coherence - internal

All the data sources have the same methodology.


9. Accessibility and clarity Top
9.1. Dissemination format - News release

not applicable

9.2. Dissemination format - Publications

Publications of the ISPV-MZS and ISP results in the Excel or PDF form are available on the MLSA website (www.mpsv.cz) in section „Income and Living Conditions“, and on the web portal www.ispv.cz in section “Výsledky šetření”.

National SES results for 2010 are available on the website of the Czech Statistical Office: www.czso.cz/csu/czso/struktura-mezd-zamestnancu-2010-gi961ntrv5

Some results are also included in the CZSO publications: “Statistical Yearbook”, “Labour Statistics: Time series of Basic Indicators” and “Focused on Women, on Men”.



Annexes:
Struktura mezd zaměstnanců v roce 2010
9.3. Dissemination format - online database

not used

9.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not applicable.

9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

The SES data are accessible only by Eurostat.

9.5. Dissemination format - other

Not used.

9.6. Documentation on methodology

The development of the ISPV methodology is gathered in the internal materials of the directing Commission. Respondents have been obtained with paper Instruction manual how to prepare entering data before the data collection. It is available in electronic form too, on the www.ispv.cz, in section “Pro respondenty šetření”. At the same place, in section “Výsledky šetření” and subsection “Metodika” there is available also Quality Report of the ISPV, which has been produced following the European recommendations since 2003. Both publications on ISPV-MZS and ISP include Technical annex, with a basic description of the survey and statistical procedures.

The results of the national SES have been presented during a special Press Conference of the Czech Statistical Office every year. The MLSA have published a Press Report on the ISPV-MZS and ISP results via internet.

9.7. Quality management - documentation

Not used.

9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not used

9.7.2. Metadata - consultations

Not used


10. Cost and Burden Top

The original survey (ISPV) has been provided by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs as a regular data source. The cost is not estimated.

Administrative burden on the respondents is an average time needed for supply of data: 3,0 hours.


11. Confidentiality Top
11.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidential data are not disseminated.

11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Confidential data are not disseminated.


12. Comment Top

Not used.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top