2.2. Management modes
Procurement or grant award procedures for projects financed under EU external aid programmes vary according to the different arrangements for managing the project (referred to as 'management modes').
The EU Financial Regulation1 and its Rules of Application2 in force since 01/01/2013 introduced important changes in the existing management modes. The changes entered into force on 01/01/2014. They also apply to the EDF.
The notion of management modes remains the same. They are different ways to implement the EU budget or the EDF funds, depending on the variable level of implication of the European Commission in its implementation. This is attained through the delegation of a number of budget implementation tasks (such as conclusion of contracts, their operational and financial management, audit, evaluation, etc.).
The former management modes (centralised3, decentralised, joint and shared) have been streamlined to just three:
The European Commission is in charge of all EU budget implementation tasks, which are performed directly by its departments either at headquarters or in the EU delegations or through European executive agencies.
Therefore, the European Commission or the European executive agency is the contracting authority and takes decisions on behalf and for the account of the partner countries. In such cases, references in this Practical Guide to the 'contracting authority' refer actually to the European Commission (or where the case may be to an EU executive agency), acting on behalf and for the account of the partner countries.
Deviations from standard procedures (exceptions/derogations) and prior approvals/events to be reported laid down in the Practical Guide are allowed in compliance with internal procedures.
Under indirect management, the European Commission entrusts budget implementation tasks to:
This Practical Guide focuses on the first case, when the European Commission entrusts the budget implementation tasks to partner countries5.
It applies mutatis mutandis in those rare cases where international organisations, development agencies or other bodies must use EU contracting procedures.
Two modalities are possible under indirect management with partner countries:
Indirect management with ex-ante controls: Decisions on the procurement and award of contracts are taken by the partner country, which acts as the contracting authority, following prior authorisation of the European Commission. This prior authorisation can encompass in some cases and only for specific commitments, a deviation from standard procedures (exception/derogation) or prior approval/event to be reported. Deviations, prior approvals and events to be reported are processed internally by the European Commission.
Indirect management with ex-post controls: decisions provided for in the financing agreement are taken by the partner country, which acts as the contracting authority without prior authorisation by the European Commission. However, deviations from the standard procedures laid down in the PRAG require an authorisation by the European Commission. The different ex-ante and ex-post control procedures are explained throughout this Practical Guide.
The European Commission delegates implementation tasks to the EU Member States. This mode is rarely used in the implementation of external actions, but there are a few cases such as joint operational programmes on cross-border cooperation implemented by a joint managing authority (for instance under the European Neighbourhood Instrument, ENI, or the Pre-accession Assistance, IPA II).
The choice of management mode is an essential element of the financing decision and it is reflected in the corresponding documents (e.g. the 'action document' for the relevant financing decision and (annual) action programme).
Important: For some time there will be an overlap between the new management modes and the former ones (as it will be the case for Financing Agreements signed before 2014 making reference to the former management modes). For the sake of clarity, in this Practical Guide reference is made solely to the management modes in force as from 01/01/2014 described above in this chapter. However, in the case of on-going actions under the former management modes, the explanations in this Practical Guide remain valid using the following equivalences (just for the management modes described in this Practical Guide):
FORMER MANAGEMENT MODES
NEW MANAGEMENT MODES
(in force as from 01/01/2014)
DIRECT CENTRALISED MANAGEMENT
DECENTRALISED MANAGEMENT with EX-ANTE CONTROLS
INDIRECT MANAGEMENT with EX-ANTE CONTROL
DECENTRALISED MANAGEMENT WITH EX-POST CONTROLS
INDIRECT MANAGEMENT with EX-POST CONTROL
Important points with regard to indirect management:
In most cases, this Practical Guide applies in (i) direct and (ii) indirect management with partner countries6. Note, however, that the European Commission may, in some specific cases, allow partner countries to use other procedures depending on prior positive assessment of such procedures.
The European Commission's involvement in contracts signed by the partner countries under indirect management is to authorise the financing of the contracts and check, notably with reference to established checklists, that the procedures, the implementation of the contracts and the expenditure are correctly carried out. If the procedures established in this Practical Guide (or whatever procedure the European Commission decides must be used) are not followed, the expenditure incurred on the related operations is ineligible for EU financing. The European Commission's intervention is limited to checking whether the conditions for EU financing have been met.
In no case will intervention aim at compromising the principle according to which these contracts are national contracts drafted and concluded only by the contracting authority from the partner country. Tenderers, candidates and applicants for these contracts do not possess any form of contractual relationship with the European Commission during or after the implementation of the contracts. Their only contractual relationship is with the contracting authority. A contracting authority's decision may not be replaced by a decision taken by the EU. The contracting authority assumes full responsibility for its actions and will be accountable for those actions in any subsequent audit or other investigation.
The box below summarises the control procedures that the European Commission must follow for each management mode.
The contracts are concluded directly by the European Commission, acting on behalf of the partner country. It draws up shortlists (restricted procedures) and is responsible for issuing calls for tenders and calls for proposals, publishing them, receiving applications, tenders and proposals, chairing evaluation committees, deciding on the results of the procedures, managing complaints and signing the contracts.
INDIRECT MANAGEMENT WITH EX-ANTE CONTROLS:
The contracts are concluded by the contracting authority designated in a financing agreement, i.e. the government or an entity of the partner country with legal personality with which the European Commission concludes the financing agreement.
Before the procedure is launched, the contracting authority must submit the documents (tender dossier or call for proposal file) to the European Commission for approval. The European Commission verifies that they have been drafted in accordance with the procedures and templates laid down in this Practical Guide (or whatever procedure the European Commission decides must be used). The contracting authority is then responsible for drawing up shortlists (restricted procedures), issuing the calls for tenders and calls for proposals, receiving applications, tenders and proposals, chairing evaluation committees and deciding on the results of the procedure. Before signing contracts, the contracting authority submits the result of the evaluations to the European Commission for approval. The European Commission verifies conformity with the applicable procedures. The contracting authority also sends the contracts to the European Commission for endorsement before signing them7.
The European Commission must always be invited when applications and tenders are opened and evaluated and a European Commission representative should, as a rule, attend as an observer in all or part of the evaluation committee meetings. The European Commission pays a particular attention to potential conflicts of interests.
The contracting authority must submit all relevant notices in electronic form to the European Commission for publication (See annex A11e), with the exception of the cases referred to in the Practical Guide for Programme Estimates.
Under the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II), a phased waiver of different types of ex-ante controls may apply.
INDIRECT MANAGEMENT WITH EX-POST CONTROLS:
Contracts are concluded directly by the contracting authority designated in a financing agreement. For instance the government or an entity of the partner country with the same legal personality with which the European Commission concludes the financing agreement. The contracting authority draws up shortlists (restricted procedures) and is responsible for issuing invitations to tender, receiving tenders, chairing the evaluation committees, deciding on the results of the procedures and signing the contracts without the prior authorisation of the European Commission. The contracting authority must submit all relevant notices in electronic form to the European Commission for publication (See annex A11e).
SHARED MANAGEMENT AND INDIRECT MANAGEMENT WITH ENTITIES OTHER THAN PARTNER COUNTRIES:
In these cases, the delegated entity (e.g. a national agency or international organisation) concludes contracts with third parties.
The delegated entity procedures generally apply.
That delegated entity is responsible for publishing the relevant notices. Therefore those notices are published neither on the EU Official Journal nor on the EuropeAid Website.
The European Commission may verify the procedure ex post, regardless of whether the European Commission has carried out a prior 'pillar assessment' of the delegated entity.
1Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25/10/2012.
2Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29/10/2012.
3Centralised management had two variants, direct centralised (where the European Commission was the contracting authority and took decisions for the partner country and EU delegations) and indirect centralised (where some budget implementation tasks were delegated to a national body, usually development agencies, which thus became the contracting authority).
4Please refer to Article 58.1.(c) of the FR for a detailed list of cases.
5Please note that the European Commission usually undertakes directly activities such as evaluation and audits even under indirect management with partner countries.
6Financial procedures under indirect management with partner countries (i.e. payments) are set out in the Practical Guide to procedures for Programme Estimates.
7 The European Commission's endorsement of the contracts is not necessary in certain cases, which are specified in this Practical Guide or in the Practical Guide to procedures for Programme Estimates.