Waste
CLOSED
Stakeholder consultation on
Adaptation to scientific
and technical progress
under Directive 2002/95/EC
of the European Parliament and of the
Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous
substances in electrical and electronic equipment
for the purpose of a possible
amendment of the annex |
Note: with this consultation stakeholders are
not requested to submit additional requests for exemption.
Stakeholders are only requested to comment on the
exemptions listed in this consultation document and to respond to
the four questions with as much detail as possible.
1. Introduction
Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC on the restriction of the
use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic
equipment provides ‘that
from 1 July 2006, new electrical and electronic equipment put on
the market does not contain lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium,
PBB or PBDE.’ The annex to the Directive lists a limited number
of applications of lead, mercury, cadmium and hexavalent chromium,
which are exempted from the requirements of Article 4(1).
According to Article 5 (2) of Directive 2002/95/EC the Commission
is required to consult the relevant stakeholders before amending
the annex. The results of this consultation will be forwarded to
the Technical Adaptation Committee of the Directive 2002/95/EC and
the Commission services will provide an account of the information
received. Although the Commission will analyse the results of this
stakeholder consultation carefully, please note that as with all
stakeholder consultations, this action is only one part of the
decision making process.
Neither the fact that a stakeholder consultation is being launched,
nor the results of this stakeholder consultation should be interpreted
as a political or legal signal that the Commission intends to take
a given action.
2. Proposal for additional exemptions
Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC provides that materials
and components can be exempted from the substance restrictions contained
in Article 4(1) if their elimination or substitution via design
changes or materials and components which do not require any of
the materials or substances referred to therein is technically or
scientifically impracticable, or where the negative environmental,
health and/or consumer safety impacts caused by substitution outweigh
the environmental, health and/or consumer safety benefits thereof.
On the basis of this provision the Commission has received from
industry additional requests for applications to be exempted from
the requirements of the RoHS Directive.
It should be noted that since the wording for some of the exemptions
is not self explanatory, some exemption requests may overlap with
exemption requests covered by previous consultations. The Commission
services have published the requests as worded by the submitters.
The titles for the exemptions as submitted by industry and the
request for exemptions, with the substantiated evidence (available
by clicking on the title), are:
- On-Semi
MCR265-10 SCR;
- Components
NEC V55;
- The
use of lead in solder applications for electronic components of
musical instruments having an average lifespan in excess of 10
years;
- Lead
solder alloy in Surge protective devices (SPDs);
- Inventory
of Special ICs having tin-lead solder on/in leads/balls, used
in specialist/professional equipment;
- Lead
alloys as electrical/mechanical solder for transducers used in
high-powered professional and commercial loudspeakers;
- Solder
containing lead for applications where the local temperature exceeds
150 C and reliable operation for a minimum of 30,000 hours is
required;
- T
in-lead solder in the manufacture of professional audio equipment;
- Specific
modular units including tin-lead solder being used in special
professional equipment;
- Lead
in electronic vacuum tubes;
- Lead in aluminium used in gas valves for domestic cooking appliances;
- “8.
Cadmium and its compounds in electrical contacts except for applications
of one-shot operation function such as thermal links and cadmium
plating except for the applications banned under Directive 91/338/EEC
amending Directive 76/769/EEC relating to the restriction on the
marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations.”;
- Lead
in solder of parts recovered from gaming/amusement machines put
on the market before 1/07/06 and reused for the same purpose within
a manufacturer’s closed loop until July 2014;
- Lead
in solders in components and assemblies used in non-consumer products,
provided that: - such components and assemblies were purchased
or are subject to a proven last-time buy contract placed before
1 July, 2006; and - such components and assemblies are used in
models of EEE that were already available on the market before
1 July 2006;
- “8.
Cadmium plating as defined in Directive 91/338/EEC except for
applications banned under Directive 91/338/EEC amending Directive
76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of
certain dangerous substances and preparations.”
4. Consultation of interested parties
In preparation of the decision for the consideration of the items
listed above based on Article 5(1) (b), the Commission services
would like to consult interested parties.
In particular, stakeholders are requested to provide, for each
entry, information on: the current existence of feasible substitutes
in an industrial and/or commercial scale; any restrictions that
apply to such substitutes; the costs and benefits and advantages
and disadvantages of such a substitutes; provide a precise wording
for each exemption. Stakeholders are requested to support, as far
as possible, their contribution with technical and scientific evidence.
1. On-Semi MCR265-10 SCR.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
2. Components NEC V55.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
3. The use of lead in solder applications for electronic components
of musical instruments having an average lifespan in excess of 10
years.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
4. Lead solder alloy in Surge protective devices (SPDs).
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
5. Inventory of Special ICs having tin-lead solder on/in leads/balls,
used in specialist/professional equipment.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
6. Lead alloys as electrical/mechanical solder for transducers
used in high-powered professional and commercial loudspeakers.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
7. Solder containing lead for applications where the local temperature
exceeds 150 C and reliable operation for a minimum of 30,000 hours
is required.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
8. T in-lead solder in the manufacture of professional audio
equipment.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
9. Specific modular units including tin-lead solder being used
in special professional equipment.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
10. Lead in electronic vacuum tubes.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
11. Lead in aluminium used in gas valves for domestic cooking
appliances.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
12. “8. Cadmium and its compounds in electrical contacts
except for applications of one-shot operation function such as thermal
links and cadmium plating except for the applications banned under
Directive 91/338/EEC amending Directive 76/769/EEC relating to the
restriction on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances
and preparations”.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
13. Lead in solder of parts recovered from gaming/amusement
machines put on the market before 1/07/06 and reused for the same
purpose within a manufacturer’s closed loop until July 2014.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
14. Lead in solders in components and assemblies used in non-consumer
products, provided that: - such components and assemblies were purchased
or are subject to a proven last-time buy contract placed before
1 July, 2006; and - such components and assemblies are used in models
of EEE that were already available on the market before 1 July 2006.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
15. “8. Cadmium plating as defined in Directive 91/338/EEC
except for applications banned under Directive 91/338/EEC amending
Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and
use of certain dangerous substances and preparations”.
- Do feasible substitutes currently exist in an industrial and/or
commercial scale?
- Do any restrictions apply to such substitutes?
- What are the costs and benefits and advantages and disadvantages
of such substitutes?
- Please indicate a precise wording for this exemption.
Interested parties are invited to send their comments
by 10 February 2006 at the latest by e-mail to ENV-RoHS@ec.europa.eu or by post to:
European Commission
DG Environnent, Unit G4 – Consultation Directive
2002/95/EC
B-1049, Brussels, Belgium.
***
Responses submitted electronically will be posted on this web
site as they are received, unless respondents specifically request
that their contribution should not be publicised. In the latter
case, responses should be clearly and visibly marked with the words "Not for publication”.
***
OJ
L 37, 13.2.2003, p. 19
|