Navigation path

High level navigation

European Redlist Search for a Species

Page navigation

Additional tools

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Print version
  • Decrease text
  • Increase text


Taxonomic scope

All terrestrial and freshwater reptile species native to Europe or naturalised in Europe before AD 1500 were included in the assessment. Species introduced to Europe by man after AD 1500 were considered by the assessment, but were classed as Not Applicable. Similarly, species that are of marginal occurrence in Europe were classed as Not Applicable. Reptile taxonomy largely follows the TIGR Reptile Database compiled by Peter Uetz and made available on the World Wide Web at:, although it departs from this in a few circumstances. For Testudines, the taxonomy presented by Fritz & Havas (2007) was followed. Distinct subpopulations and subspecies of reptiles within Europe were not individually assessed as part of this project.

Data Collection

For every reptile species native to Europe or naturalised before AD 1500, the following data were compiled.

  • Species’ taxonomic classification
  • Geographic range (including a distribution map)
  • Red List Category and Criteria
  • Population information
  • Habitat preferences
  • Major threats
  • Conservation measures (in place, and needed)
  • Species utilization
  • Other general information
  • Key literature references

These data were based on initial information gathered as part of the IUCN Global Reptile Assessment (IUCN, CI and NatureServe). Much of this earlier material originated during an earlier review of the conservation status of reptiles and amphibians in the Mediterranean basin (Cox et al. 2006). All species had their global status assessed according to the 2001 IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1 (

Preliminary species summary reports, distribution maps and global assessments were distributed to all the participants before the workshop to allow them to review the data presented and prepare any changes to the data.

Assessments of the tortoises and freshwater turtles were based on information compiled by Peter Paul van Dijk of CI’s Center for Applied Biodiversity Science as part of the earlier Mediterranean review. The provisional global and regional assessments were not reviewed at the workshop, but were provided by the pertinent Red List Authority (the IUCN Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group), and these evaluations must also be considered provisional at the time this report went to press.

Data review and evaluation of assessments

Expert herpetologists for Europe were invited to attend a five-day regional review workshop, held in conjunction with an IUCN review of reptile and amphibian species of the Wider Caucasus, at the Grida City Hotel in Antalya, Turkey in September 2008.

Focused working groups were organised to efficiently review identified geographical sets of species (e.g., Iberian reptiles). New information was added to the species summaries and maps, and corrections to existing data were made. Preliminary Red List Assessments for each species were then made at the global, European and EU 27 levels.

Facilitating staff from the IUCN Red List Unit and the IUCN/SSC-CI/CABS Biodiversity Assessment Unit evaluated the assessments to check they complied with the guidelines for application of the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria and included the most up-to-date, comprehensive information.

Following the review workshop, the data were edited, and outstanding questions were resolved through communications with the workshop participants. The post-workshop draft assessments were also made available on an FTP site to allow the participating scientists to make any final edits and corrections.