European Commission
EUROPA > European CommissionEnvironment > LIFE Contact | Search on EUROPA
Home | Best LIFE Projects | 2007-2008

Best LIFE-Nature Projects 2007-2008

Best of the best

The EU Member States represented on the LIFE Committee, together with the LIFE Unit, have identified the 26 Best LIFE-Nature projects completed during 2007 and 2008.

 

26 Best LIFE Nature Projects

This Best LIFE-Nature Projects is a new award in 2009 that aims to recognise some of the best LIFE Nature projects that completed their work during the reference period 2007-2008. All projects completed within the reference period were initially technically assessed by the LIFE Unit’s External Assistance Team to produce a first list of Best Projects. The final selection was undertaken by the Member States. From the 26 "Best" projects, 5 projects were selected as being "Best of the Best" projects. These are, in no particular order:

  The 5 "Best of the Best" LIFE Nature Projects 2007 -2008
Award Lince Andalucía
Population recovery of Iberian Lynx in Andalusia
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Regional government of Andalusia (Spain)
Award Boreal forests
Restoration of boreal forests and forest-covered mires
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Metsähallitus, Etelä-Suomen luontopalvelut (Finland)
Award HUNVIPURS
Establishing the background of saving the Hungarian meadow viper (Vipera ursinii rakosiensis) from extinction
web summary | website
Beneficiary: MME BirdLife (Hungary)
Award Mikri Prespa
Conservation of priority bird species in Lake Mikri Prespa, Greece
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Society for the protection of Prespa (Greece)
Award Gulf of Finland
Management of wetlands along the Gulf of Finland migratory flyway
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Uudenmaan ympäristökeskus (Finland)
The 21 "Best" LIFE Nature Projects 2007-2008
Westliche Dümmerniederung
Re-wetting of the Western Dümmer fen area
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Land Niedersachsen (Germany)
Caretta
Reduction of mortality of Caretta caretta in the Greek seas
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Sea Turtle Protection Society of Greece
GERVE
Ecosystemic management of rivers with European mink 
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Gestión Ambiental, Viveros y Repoblaciones de Navarra, S.A. (Spain)
Olvassuo
Protection of aapa mire wilderness in Ostrobothnia and Kainuu 
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Metsähallitus, Natural Heritage Services, Ostrobothnia-Kainuu (Finland)
Freira da Madeira
Conservation of Zino's Petrel through restoration of its habitat
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Parque Natural da Madeira - Autoridade Governamental (Portugal)
Pearl mussels
Conservation of habitats of pearl mussels in Belgium 
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Ministere de la Region Wallone represented by the Centre de Recherche de la Nature, des Forêts et du Bois (Belgium)
Pietrosul Rodnei
Restoration forest habitats from Pietrosul Rodnei biosphere reserve 
web summary | website
Beneficiary: ICAS-Forest Research and Management Institute (Romania)
FALCO ELEONORAE
Conservation measures of Falco eleonorae in Greece
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Hellenic Ornithological SocietyBirdLife Greece
Aapa & Avi
Protection and usage of aapa mires with a rich avifauna
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Lapland Regional Environment Centre (Finland)
Blanket bog
Restoring active blanket bog of European importance in North Scotland
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (United Kingdom)
Saint Hubert
Rehabilitation of peat and wet habitats on the Saint-Hubert Plateau
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Unité de Gestion Cynégétique du Massif Forestier de St-Hubert ASBL (Belgium)
10GEMETEN
Tiengemeten, restoration of freshwater tidal area in the Haringvliet estuary, the Netherlands
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Dienst Landelijk Gebied (The Netherlands)
Karelian Mires
Karelian mires and virgin forests - pearls in the chain of geohistory
web summary | website
Beneficiary: North Karelia Regional Environment Centre (Finland)
RIVIERE D'AIN
Conservation of the habitats created by the fluvial dynamics of the lower Ain river
web summary | website
Beneficiary:SIVU du Bassin Versant de la Basse Vallée de l'Ain (France)
3 Bossen Vlaamse Ardennen
Action Plan for conservation and restoration of three woods in the Flemish Ardennes 
web summary | website
Beneficiary: World Wide Fund for Nature (Belgium)
Crex Slovenia
Establishing long-term protection of Crex crex in Slovenia 
web summary | website
Beneficiary: DOPPSBirdLife Slovenia
Bande rhénane
Preservation and restoration of the Rhine's valley habitats
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Région Alsace, DAFTE (France)
Donauufer
Restoration of Danube river banks
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Nationalpark Donau-Auen GmbH (Austria)
LIFE to Koli
LIFE to Koli - Restoration of the forests and meadows in the nature park
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Metsäntutkimuslaitos (Finland)
Peneireiro
Re-establishment of the Lesser Kestrel (Falco naumanni) in Portugal
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Liga para a Protecção da Natureza (Portugal)
Söderaasen
Restoration of deciduous forest in Söderåsen National Park
web summary | website
Beneficiary: Länsstyrelsen i Skåne Län / Söderåsens Nationalpark (Sweden)

How were the projects selected?

Scoring of completed LIFE-Nature projects began in the summer of 2004. The system was introduced by the Commission, following an initiative taken by Sweden and the Netherlands. A set of ‘best practice’ criteria was developed in collaboration with the Member States. These criteria included: projects’ contribution to immediate and long-term environmental, economic and social improvements; their degree of innovation and transferability; their relevance to policy and their cost-effectiveness. In view of the importance of these aspects to project success, project beneficiaries are also required to provide an After-LIFE Communication Plan and an Analysis of the long-term benefits of the project with their final report. This information forms an integral part of the evaluation process.

All completed projects were initially technically assessed by the LIFE Unit’s external monitoring team (the Astrale consortium). The monitors ranked all the projects that ended during the reference period (summer 2008 to spring 2009), to produce a first list. The final selection was undertaken by the Member States.


  • TOP