EU public procurement rules save taxpayers' money
In a market worth over €1.500 billion - representing over 16% of total EU GDP - EU public procurement Directives have reduced the prices paid by public authorities for good and services by more than 30%.
These and other positive results of EU procurement policy have been identified in the European Commission's Report on the economic effects of public procurement (Feb 2004).
Green Public Procurement in the EU-25
The consortium TAKE-5 finalised for the European Commission in May 2006 the report Green Public Procurement in Europe. It highlights that seven EU Member States (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden and UK) - known as the ‘Green-7’ - are currently implementing more elements of GPP than the ‘Other-18’ Member States. This means that they consistently have more tenders with green criteria than the rest within the EU-25.
The ‘Green-7’ are characterised by
- Strong political drivers and/or national guidelines
- National programmes (GPP has been the subject of a national programme and the issue has been addressed for a number of years)
- Information sources (all have GPP websites and information sources available which often contain product related criteria and specifications)
- Innovative procurement techniques (a majority of the ‘Green-7’ are using dedicated tools, e.g. life-cycle costs as an award criterion, or functional specifications/requests for environmental variants)
- Purchasing organisations applying environmental management systems (several ‘Green-7’ countries make use of environmental management systems which address GPP)
Europe needs to catch up
Public purchasers are often under the impression that they already apply environmental criteria when purchasing. However, the GPP report shows that only 36% of the tender documents of all 25 Member States actually contain appropriate and legal environmental criteria. Positive exceptions are Sweden and Germany with a rate of more than 60% of all tender documents analysed in the TAKE-5 study including environmental criteria.
Definition of criteria – a crucial factor
Many public tenders contain references to the environment. But these criteria and references are often not well defined and therefore do not result in a greener purchase. One of the main reasons for unclear references is the lack of training in this area – one of the main barriers to GPP.
For instance: 'Computers should be energy efficient' this criterion is not sufficient to allow bidders to make balanced bids and won't allow purchasing authorities to make an objective comparison between bids.
It depends on the type of purchased product or service
Certain categories of purchase are more suitable for greening than others. Professional services such as advertising, general management, research and auditing services seldom contain environmental criteria whereas furniture construction and IT equipment often do. The different levels of GPP between product categories can therefore be considerable.
The Take-5 study has identified following product groups as suitable for 'greening' in the framework of green public procurement, based on the financial and environmental impact and the availability of 'environmental friendly' products in the market place:
- Cleaning products and services
- Horticultural services
- Medical devices – pharmaceuticals
- (Electrical) machinery - communication equipment
- Energy
- Chemical products, rubber, plastic
- Food products and beverages, Restaurant services
- Architectural, construction, installation and related consultancy services
- Sewage- and refuse-disposal services
- Sanitation and environmental services
- Transport equipment
- Office machinery (computers/monitors/printers/copiers)
- Construction work
- Construction products (including heating/cooling/lighting appliances)
- Furniture and other manufactured goods
- Paper, printed matter, printing services
- Transport and communication services
|