The studies are subject to a disclaimer and copyright. The studies have been carried out for the European Commission and express the opinions of the organisations having undertaken them. The views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the information given in the studies, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof.
Copyright in these studies is held by the European Union. Persons wishing to use the contents of these studies (in whole or in part) for purposes other than their personal use are invited to submit a written request by electronic form.
"EmployRES-II project quantifies positive effects of renewables. Researchers found out that further promotion of renewable energy will contribute significantly towards growth and employment, reduction of energy imports (in particular natural gas) and GHG emission savings. The study can be found here.”
In December 2014, the European Commission received a market study on the voluntary common EU certification scheme for non-residential buildings, in accordance with EPBD Article 11(9). Giving an overview of existing voluntary schemes, this report aims at analysing the demand for a European wide voluntary scheme. It concludes that reliability, cost and international acceptance are key factors for scheme selection. The main added value of this voluntary EU scheme would be to allow a consistent comparison between non-residential buildings across the EU. Besides, it could contribute to raising the ambition for building certification in some Member States. The study also shows that the voluntary EU scheme should build on CEN standards, start with a pilot phase (e.g. with offices and hotels), take a modular approach for energy performance only, and be applied both for public & private buildings, as well as new & existing buildings. Finally, it is recommended that the voluntary EU scheme should use a comparative label design, and that a third party should be responsible for the technical development of it.