Navigation path

The European Union and its Member States have been engaged in a process of market integration over a long period. An initial key objective of economic integration has been the removal or elimination of barriers between Member States' markets. Despite important successes, the process of EU integration can be further exploited.
To form a basis for deeper integration, in 2006 the European Commission
decided to launch a Single Market Review to redefine the strategy and to give
the process a new impetus. One of the new agreed approaches towards the single
market of the 21st century is a shift from the initial emphasis on removing
barriers to trade to one of making sure that markets function better and
benefit consumers and businesses.
A cornerstone of the market-integration process was the adoption and
implementation of a major legislative programme, the Single Market Programme,
resulting in the elimination of non-tariff trade barriers by 1 January 1993.
The removal of these barriers was targeted at creating a large integrated
market for goods and services, enabling the realisation of economies of scale.
The fiercer competition in this integrated market was expected to result in
(allocative and productive) efficiency gains. It was also aimed at providing
more incentives for European producers to invest in product and process
innovations, thereby improving the dynamic efficiency of the European economy.
For European consumers, the internal market was also seen as a source of
benefits through wider choice and lower prices.
While the internal market has contributed to promoting integration and, to a
certain extent, competition within the EU, its potential has not been fully
exploited. Initial expectations that it would be a launching pad for a more
dynamic, innovative and competitive economy at world level have not been met.
In the early 1980s, the convergence in the level of GDP per capita in the EU
towards US levels came to an end. Over the past ten years, the average annual
per capita growth rate of the European Union has even been below that of the
US.
A recent DG ECFIN study analyses the effects of the implementation of the
Internal Market Programme and proposes ideas on how its potential can be better
exploited. First, the paper offers a broader perspective to the analysis of the
internal market by exploring its close links to the rapidly changing economic
environment. Second, it puts together a comprehensive body of empirical
evidence, based on an analysis of trade, FDI, M&A, prices, and regulation
data, which enables a thorough stock-taking exercise of what has been achieved
in terms of European economic integration. Thirdly, it analyses the remaining
barriers to the completion of the internal market while presenting a critical
review of the adequacy of the instruments that have been used so far.
Overall, the paper concludes that the internal market is a powerful instrument
to promote economic integration and to increase competition within the EU, and
that it has been the source of large macroeconomic benefits. However, these
gains could have been substantially larger if the removal of most of the
remaining cross-border barriers had been achieved. In particular, the initial
expectations that the internal market would serve as a catalyst for creating a
more dynamic, innovative and competitive economy at the world level have not
been met. Various reasons for this have been identified, namely: the slow and
sometimes incomplete implementation of EU Directives, the inadequacy of some
instruments, the persistence of barriers to cross-border trade and investment,
particularly in services, and the slow development of an internal market for
knowledge. Building on the evidence and analysis, the paper concludes with
eight suggestions to guide the design of policy-making for the internal market
in the 21st century.
The process of EU integration is far from exhausted and the internal market can
be further exploited. As a consequence, in 2006 the European Commission decided
to launch a Single Market Review to redefine the strategy and to give the
process a new impetus.
One of the new agreed approaches towards the single market of the 21st century
is a shift from the initial emphasis on removing barriers to trade to one of
making sure that markets function better and benefit consumers and businesses.
To achieve this, the EU needs to modernise its approach to make single market
policy more impact driven and result oriented.
Market monitoring is key to understanding the obstacles that prevent markets
from functioning well. Therefore, we need to analyse the barriers to market
integration, market access, technological developments and innovation, as well
as to understand well the price and wage adjustment mechanisms in changing
market conditions. This will enable better solutions for the particular
challenges of each sector and market. Furthermore, this approach will enable
identification of those markets where there are concrete problems and where
policies will have maximum impact. Accordingly, clear priorities have to be
established and attention has to be focused on those areas where consolidation
of the internal market has stalled, particularly in the service sectors. In
this regard, one essential element is to achieve greater financial
integration.
In the framework of the Single Market Review, an inter-service Working Group on
Product Market and Sector Monitoring was set up. The working group's mandate
has been to define a common approach for the organisation of product market and
sector monitoring within the European Union. An improved monitoring of markets
is expected to define better-targeted and more result-oriented single market
policies. The approach proposed is flexible, acknowledging that no single
method of market monitoring can cover all possible situations, and it is based
on the analysis of existing experience with market and sector monitoring within
the Commission services and in the Member States. A two-stage process is
foreseen: the first stage consists of a sectoral screening aimed at identifying
the sectors offering the greatest potential benefits from market monitoring. In
the second stage, the selected sectors will be examined in more detail.