Navigation path

HOME
Policy areas
Sectors
Who is in charge?
Competition and you
Cases
Publications Home
By subject
Competition policy
Antitrust and cartels
Merger control
State aid
International cooperation
By type
Annual report
Newsletters and articles
Reports, studies, handbooks
Brochures and factsheets
Infographics
Speeches
Press releases
Legislation and case-law
Case documents

Publications

Reports, studies and handbooks

Published in the last three years

The contents of external reports do not necessarily reflect the position or opinion of the European Commission.

  • Economic impact of competition policy enforcement on the functioning of telecoms markets in the EU
    (published June 2017)
    This study describes the main changes in market performance and competition policy enforcement by European competition authorities over the period 2002-2015. It also provides an in-depth quantitative analysis of three decisions spanning the whole range of competition policy instruments: the Telekomunikacja Polska (TP) antitrust case, the T-Mobile/Orange UK merger case and the German aid schemes to bring broadband to rural areas. The study shows that the three decisions had an overall positive effect on the functioning of telecoms markets. A short backgrounder is available, as well as appraisals by Christine Zulehner (Goethe University Frankfurt, Telecom ParisTech, WIFO Vienna and CEPR) and Matthew Weinberg (Drexel University).
  • Improving Monitoring Indicators System to Support DG Competition's Future Policy Assessments,
    (published June 2017)
  • Report on Zero-rating practices in broadband markets,
    (published June 2017)
  • Study on the Passing-On of Overcharges
    (published October 2016)
    EU Directive 2014/104 on antitrust damages actions establishes that anyone who has suffered harm caused by an infringement of EU antitrust rules can claim full compensation. This includes claims by indirect purchasers (e.g. consumers who bought a product from a retailer who is a cartelist's direct customer) if the direct customer fully or partially "passed on" the cartel overcharge to them. Drawing on relevant economic theory and quantitative methods, as well as relevant legal practice and rules, the Study provides judges, legal practitioners and parties to antitrust damages actions with a practical framework for assessing and quantifying such passing-on effects. A French Executive summary is available.
  • Support study for impact assessment concerning the review of Merger Regulation regarding minority shareholdings
    (published October 2016)
    The purpose of the study is to provide DG Competition with additional information on the topic of acquisitions of non-controlling minority shareholdings from the point of view of both competition and corporate law and practice in different jurisdictions. In particular, the study provides factual information in order to form a well-informed and comprehensive view on the current practice in jurisdictions where acquisitions of non-controlling minority shareholdings are subject to merger review, as well as on the different levels of rights usually attached to non-controlling minority shareholdings in several countries.
  • Study on the financing models for public services in the EU and their impact on competition (published October 2016)
    In order to ensure that certain ‘public services’ are guaranteed and available for the public, Member States can impose specific obligations on public or private service providers. The objective of this study is to assess how public services are financed and when those arrangements may create competition problems. There is an Executive summary available.
  • Study on judges’ training needs in the field of European competition law (June 2016)
    This study maps the jurisdictions at national level for the application of European Union competition law. It analyses the needs and demand for training among judges and proposes specific training profiles. It highlights the important role of the specialisation of courts in concentrating cases, developing expertise and enabling training to be targeted efficiently. The study also evaluates DG Competition’s “Training of National Judges” programme, proposes performance indicators and makes concrete recommendations for ensuring that the programme meets the needs of judges dealing with EU competition law in the future. Executive summaries are available in EN, DE and FR.
  • Geographic Market Definition in European Commission Merger Control (February 2016)
    On the Commission’s request, Professors Bruce Lyons and Amelia Fletcher from the University of East Anglia have prepared an independent economic report on the topic of "Geographic Market Definition in European Commission Merger Control". Professors Lyons and Fletcher have evaluated the Commission approach to geographic market definition on the basis of a sample of recent merger cases where this topic played an important role in the assessment. This study also examines how the Commission incorporates constraints from outside the geographic market in its competitive assessment of mergers. This study also examines how the Commission incorporates constraints from outside the geographic market in its competitive assessment of mergers. The Commission's practice regarding market definition was already the focus of the Competition Policy Brief Market definition in a globalised world published in March 2015 and Commissioner Vestager's speech at the Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht on 12 March 2015.
  
top