Cartels
Questions and answers
What is a cartel?
It is an illegal secret agreement concluded between competitors to fix prices, restrict supply and/or divide up markets. The agreement may take a wide variety of forms but often relates to sales prices or increases in such prices, restrictions on sales or production capacities, sharing out of product or geographic markets or customers, and collusion on the other commercial conditions for the sale of products or services.
Why are cartels harmful to consumers, businesses and to the economy in general?
Cartels shield participants from competition allowing them to charge higher prices and removing the pressure on them to improve the products they sell or find more efficient ways in which to produce them. It is the customers (companies and consumers) who foot the bill in terms of paying higher prices for lower quality and narrower choice. This not only makes consumers and businesses suffer but also adversely affects the competitiveness of the economy as a whole.
What legal basis underpins the Commission’s action to combat cartels?
Article 81 of the Treaty establishing the European Community prohibits agreements and concerted practices between firms that distort competition within the Single Market. Fines of up to 10% of their worldwide turnover may be imposed on the guilty parties.
What happens to the proceeds from fines?
The amount of the fines is paid into the Community budget. The fines therefore help to finance the European Union and reduce the tax burden on individuals.
Does the Commission have the last word?
All cartel decisions by the Commission may be appealed against before the Court of First Instance (CFI) and then before the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Luxembourg. They can, therefore, be closely scrutinised by these two courts, which are empowered to annul decisions in whole or in part and to reduce or increase fines, where this is deemed appropriate.
What is the European Commission’s leniency programme?
It encourages firms to provide the Commission with insider information on cartels. The first firm to do so is granted total immunity from fines. Other firms that follow suit may be granted a reduction in the amount of the fine. This policy is very effective in uncovering cartels but does not prevent the Commission from conducting investigations on its own initiative. For further information, see
IP/06/1705,
MEMO/06/469
and MEMO/06/470.
Companies wishing to approach the Commission in order to benefit from the Commission notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases should consult:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/cartels/leniency/leniency.html
What practical steps has the Commission taken to step up action against
cartels?
Since June 2005 an entire Directorate composed of six units (Directorate G, with a staff of around 70) in the Competition Directorate General has been involved exclusively in helping the Commission to detect and punish cartels.
What action is open to consumers and companies who feel that they have been victims of such illegal agreements?
Any person or firm affected by anti-competitive behaviour as described in this case may bring the matter before the courts of the Member States and seek damages. The case law of the Court and Council Regulation 1/2003 both confirm that in cases before national courts, a Commission decision is binding proof that the behaviour took place and was illegal. Even though the Commission has fined the companies concerned, damages may be awarded without these being reduced on account of the Commission fine. A White Paper on antitrust damages actions has been published
(see IP/08/515
and MEMO/08/216).
More information, including a citizens' summary of the White Paper, is available at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/actionsdamages/documents.html
What are the ten largest fines imposed by the Commission in cartel
cases?
By company:
|
Firm
|
Fine (euros)
|
Year
|
|
|
896 000 000
|
2008
|
| E.ON jointly and severally with E.ON Ruhrgas1 (IP/09/1099) |
553 000 000 |
2009 |
| GDF Suez 1 (IP/09/1099) |
553 000 000 |
2009 |
|
|
479 669 850
|
2007
|
|
|
462 000 000
|
2001
|
|
|
396 562 500
|
2007
|
|
|
370 000 000
|
2008
|
|
|
318 200 000
|
2008
|
|
|
272 250 000
|
2006
|
|
|
249 600 000
|
2002
|
By sector:
|
Sector
|
Year
|
Total (euros)
|
|
Car Glass
|
2008
|
1 383 896 000
|
|
Elevators and escalators1
|
2007
|
992 312 200
|
|
Vitamins2
|
2001
|
790 515 000
|
|
Paraffin waxes1
|
2008
|
676 011 400
|
|
Synthetic rubber (BR/ESBR)1
|
2006
|
519 050 000
|
|
Flat Glass1
|
2007
|
486 900 000
|
|
Plasterboard3
|
2002
|
458 520 000
|
|
Hydrogen peroxide1
|
2006
|
388 128 000
|
Fines imposed on cartels by the Commission since 2003:
|
Year
|
Sector covered by cartel
|
Number of undertakings subject to decision
|
Total fine (euros)
|
| 2009 |
Power transformers (IP/09/1432) |
7 |
67 644 000 |
| 2009 |
Concrete reinforcing bars 1 (IP/09/1389) |
8 |
83 250 000 |
| 2009 |
Calcium Carbide 1 (IP/09/1169) |
10 |
61 120 000 |
| 2009 |
Gas 1 (IP/09/1099) |
2 |
1 106 000 000 |
| 2009 |
|
6 |
131 510 000 |
|
2008
|
|
4
|
1 383 896 000
|
|
2008
|
|
3
|
60 300 000
|
|
2008
|
|
10
|
676 011 400
|
|
2008
|
|
4
|
4 970 000
|
|
2008
|
|
4
|
79 070 000
|
|
2008
|
|
10
|
32 755 500
|
|
2008
|
|
2
|
34 230 000
|
|
2007
|
|
6
|
247 635 000
|
|
2007
|
|
4
|
486 900 000
|
|
2007
|
|
3
|
74 790 000
|
|
2007
|
|
5
|
183 651 000
|
|
2007
|
|
7
|
328 644 000
|
|
2007
|
|
4
|
273 783 000
|
|
2007
|
|
5
|
992 312 200
|
|
2007
|
|
11
|
750 712 500
|
|
2006
|
|
1
|
3 168 000
|
|
2006
|
|
6
|
519 050 000
|
|
2006
|
|
1
|
10 000 000
|
|
2006
|
|
11
|
314 760 000
|
|
2006
|
|
14
|
266 717 000
|
|
2006
|
|
5
|
344 562 500
|
|
2006
|
|
9
|
388 128 000
|
|
2005
|
|
4
|
75 860 000
|
|
2005
|
|
16
|
290 710 000
|
|
2005
|
|
6
|
56 052 000
|
|
2005
|
|
11
|
43 497 000
|
|
2005
|
|
4
|
209 507 000
|
|
2004
|
|
6
|
57 884 000
|
|
2004
|
|
3
|
47 000 000
|
|
2004
|
|
9
|
20 038 000
|
|
2004
|
|
2
|
2 500 000
|
|
2004
|
|
1
|
19 040 000
|
|
2004
|
|
9
|
222 291 100
|
|
2003
|
|
3
|
78 730 000
|
|
2003
|
|
6
|
69 531 000
|
|
2003
|
|
6
|
101 440 000
|
|
2003
|
|
5
|
113 650 000
|
|
2003
|
|
6
|
12 690 000
|
1 Appeal lodged before the CFI 2
Following judgment by the CFI 3 Appeal lodged
before the CoJ 4
Following judgment by the CoJ
|