Statement by Szabolcs Fazakas, Member of the European Court of Auditors, on the European Development Fund (EDF) contribution to a sustainable road network in sub-Saharan Africa
Type: Speech - summary
End production: 15/01/2013 First transmission: 15/01/2013
On 15 January 2013, Szabolcs Fazakas, Member of the European Court of Auditors, presented the Court's special report on the European Development Fund (EDF) contribution to a sustainable road network in Sub-Saharan Africa, which underlines that poor maintenance threatens roads in the region.
The Court concluded that the Commission is partially effective in its support for a sustainable road network in Sub-Saharan Africa. Partner countries visited by the Court do not do enough to ensure the sustainability of road infrastructure. Roads are affected to varying degrees by premature deterioration. Most of these countries have adopted institutional reforms, notably entailing the creation of road funds and road agencies, and made significant progress on road maintenance. However, many challenges remain to be addressed in all of them to ensure appropriate maintenance. Although spending on road maintenance has increased over time in all the partner countries visited by the Court, it remains insufficient to cover the needs. One main reason is the priority given in national budgets to the rehabilitation and upgrading of the road network rather than to maintenance.
The Commission is partially effective in promoting the adoption and implementation of the sector policy reforms that are required to address the existing obstacles to a sustainable road network in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Commission’s use of the conditions attached to its financial support has a moderate incentive effect. This also has an impact on policy dialogue, which the Commission does not use in to its full potential, although this dialogue has been instrumental in promoting progress in some areas, notably where the institutional framework and road maintenance funding are concerned. Technical cooperation funded by the Commission has been less successful than could be expected.
The Court recommends that in a number of respects the Commission should better focus EDF resources and make better use of conditions attached to its programmes, of policy dialogue with the partner countries' governments and technical cooperation, so as to maximise the effectiveness of the development support provided by the EDF towards a sustainable road network in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Only the original language version is authentic and it prevails in the event of its differing from the translated versions.
||Panel of the EU Court of Auditors
||SOUNDBITE by Szabolcs Fazakas, Member of the European Court of Auditors, (in ENGLISH) saying that the Court decided to examine how far the roads constructed funded by the European Development Fund are really used to the purpose they are designed for and how far they can be used in a very effective way; it means that maintenance is a crucial factor and this is why the Court audited how far the Commission promoted the sustainability of these roads; the main findings and conclusions of the Court's report are that there are many things to be done because maintenance is not the high priority, neither for the Commission, nor for the partner countries, the beneficiary countries; a lot has already been done but these countries are not really committed to adopting and implementing measures to guarantee the sustainability of the roads and to reduce the vehicles overloading - which is a crucial problem in these countries; that is why the Court's recommendation is that they should focus much more, not only on constructing new roads, not only on upgrading the existing ones, but on checking how far the sustainability of these roads can be guaranteed.
||SOUNDBITE by Szabolcs Fazakas (in ENGLISH) saying that the Commission shouldn't only help the countries to plan, design and construct the roads but to set up a policy dialogue for the technical, financial and institutional framework of the roads; there should be a road agency, there should be a Ministry of Infrastructure and they should work in a proper way; it is more dangerous to give money to them; they should be taught how to use the money in a proper way.