![]() |
Towards a Common Agricultural and Rural Policy for Europe ( Report of an Expert Group ) |
CONTENTS
Acronyms and abbreviations used
List of Tables and Figures
Summary
- 1 Introduction: Why the common agricultural policy has to continue to evolve
- 2 The challenge for the EU of Eastern enlargement
- 3 Domestic dissatisfaction with the CAP
- 3.1 Farmers
- 3.2 Food Consumers
- 3.3 Environment and cultural landscape
- 3.4 Incoherence and inconsistencies in the CAP
- 4 The move to more liberalised trade
- 5 Summary - of the reasons why the CAP must continue to evolve
- 6 Objectives and principles of a Common Agricultural and Rural Policy for Europe, CARPE
- 6.1 Objectives
- 6.2 The main elements of CARPE
- 7 The four elements of CARPE in more detail
- 7.1 Markets stabilisation (MS)
- 7.2 Environmental and Cultural Landscape Payments (ECLP)
- 7.3 Rural Development Incentives (RDI)
- 7.4 Transitional Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
- 8 Further elaboration of CARPE and how to achieve it
- 8.6 Concluding comments
Integral text
Preface
1 Introduction: why the Common Agricultural Policy has to continue to evolve
2 The challenge for the EU of Eastern enlargement
- 2.1 Political background and the December 1995 Agricultural Strategy Paper
- 2.2 Agricultural policy issues of enlargement
- 2.2.1 Budget costs
- 2.2.2 The problem of high prices
- 2.2.3 The problem of supply controls
- 2.2.4 The compensation payments under the CAP
- 2.2.5 Respecting the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture
- 2.3 Summary of the challenge of enlargement
3 Domestic dissatisfaction with the CAP
- 3.1 Farmers
- 3.2 Food consumers and society generally
- 3.2.1 Food costs
- 3.2.2 Food quality
- 3.2.3 Budget costs
- 3.3 Environment and cultural landscape
- 3.3.1 Has CAP market support damaged the environment and could lower support reduce the damage?
- 3.3.2 Environmental concerns and agri-environmental pressures
- 3.3.3 Environmentally damaging effects of the CAP
- 3.3.4 Beneficial effects of the CAP on the environment
- 3.4 Incoherence and inconsistencies in the CAP
- 3.4.1 The general imbalance in the CAP
- 3.4.2 Inconsistencies between CMOs and structural policy
- 3.4.3 Inconsistencies between CMOs and agri-environment
- 3.4.4 Inconsistencies between structural policy and agri-environment
- 3.4.5 Inconsistencies within market policy
- 3.4.6 Inconsistencies within structures policy
4 The move towards more liberalised trade
- 4.1 GATT and WTO
- 4.2 Preferential Trade Arrangements
5 Conclusions : problems of the CAP and suggested modifications
- 5.1 The nature of problems with the CAP
- 5.2 The modifications which are therefore suggested
6 Objectives and principles of a Common Agricultural and Rural Policy for Europe, CARPE
- 6.1 Objectives
- 6.2 The main elements of CARPE
7 The four elements of CARPE in more detail
- 7.1 Market Stabilisation (MS)
- 7.1.1 Justification for public stabilisation
- 7.1.2 Stabilisation methods.
- 7.2 Environmental and Cultural Landscape Payments (ECLP):
- 7.2.1 Tier 0 - legal environmental standards and PPP
- 7.2.2 Tier 1 - high nature value farming systems
- 7.2.3 Tier 2 - specific environmental management practices
- 7.3 Rural Development Incentives (RDI):
- 7.3.1 Agricultural Development Assistance
- 7.3.2 Rural Development Initiatives
- 7.4 Transitional Adjustment Assistance (TAA):
8 Further elaboration of CARPE and how to achieve it
- 8.1 Changing attitudes, political and administrative institutions
- 8.2 Simplification and integration of payments
- 8.3 Financing and co-financing of CARPE
- 8.4 How CARPE suits the CEECs
- 8.5 Distributional considerations for CARPE
- 8.6 Concluding remarks
References
Return to top of page
[DG VI Home][EUROPA][COMMISSION][SEARCH ON EUROPA][©]